Posts Tagged ‘Iran’

‘We’re Making a Fortune,’ Trump Says of High Oil Prices as Working Class Pays

October 15, 2026

President Trump Holds Midterm Election Rally In Bullhead City, Arizona

Attendees listen as US President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally on October 14, 2026 in Bullhead City, Arizona.

(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

“Workers are losing the race between wages and prices,” said one economist. “It’s no wonder workers feel left behind in the current economy.”

Jake Johnson

Oct 15, 2026

President Donald Trump attempted to spin high oil prices as a boon for the United States at a rally in Arizona on Wednesday, just hours after new federal data showed that inflation reached its highest level in months in September.

“Because of the price of oil, Texas and Oklahoma and North Dakota and all these places, we’re making a fortune,” Trump declared, referring to states that produce large amounts of crude oil. Those states are home to major fossil fuel companies that have reported windfall profits amid Trump’s illegal war on Iran.

RECOMMENDED…

Senators Schumer And Whitehouse Unveil Report On Fossil Fuel Industry's Connections To Trump Administration

‘The Billion Dollar Deal’: Senate Democrats Detail How Trump Serves Fossil Fuel Industry

Inflation Hits Highest Level in Months as Costs From Trump's Illegal War Eat Workers' Paychecks

Inflation Hits Highest Level in Months as Costs From Trump’s Illegal War Eat Workers’ Paychecks

Trump insisted that gas prices—currently at an average of $4.33 per gallon for regular gas and $6.32 for diesel—would tumble once the Iran war ends, but his administration has repeatedly given false timelines for the deadly conflict and has shown no indication that it is willing to reach a lasting diplomatic agreement.

Trump, who has profited massively from his second term in the White House, is a major investor in oil and gas companies. According to one recent analysis, the president’s investments in fossil fuel stocks have boosted his net worth by up to $15.5 million since January.

Working-class Americans, meanwhile, are struggling to make ends meet as high gas prices compound a broader affordability crisis that extends to food, housing, and other necessities. A tracker maintained by the Watson School of International and Public Affairs estimates that American consumers have paid an extra $135 billion combined in fuel costs since the start of the Iran war—roughly $1,030 per household.

Wage growth has not kept up with inflation, which rose to an annualized rate of 3.7% last month.

“ Workers are losing the race between wages and prices,” Elise Gould, senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute, wrote on Wednesday. “Nominal wage growth continues to decelerate as workers lose bargaining power at work. Workers simply don’t have the leverage to bid up their wages. Reduced leverage and higher prices translated into falling [year-over-year] real wages for six months in a row.”

“Workers have seen zero progress on affordability compared to January 2025,” Gould added. “Real wages are essentially stagnant as workers’ leverage has declined and prices have risen. It’s no wonder workers feel left behind in the current economy.”

A Harris poll published by The Guardian on Thursday shows that three-quarters of US voters are concerned about a recession, and a “vast majority of Americans agreed that there is an affordability crisis, including 96% of Republicans.”

Axios: Trump and Netanyahu Discussed Possibility of Major Attacks on Iran Before US and Israeli Elections

October 14, 2026

by Dave DeCamp | October 13, 2026 at 8:34 pm ET | Iran

President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have discussed the possibility of resuming large-scale attacks against Iran before the US and Israeli elections, according to a report from Axios.

The report, which cited unnamed US and Israeli sources, said that the two leaders had held multiple calls over the past two weeks about the possibility of resuming “major combat operations” against the Islamic Republic, including the possibility of joint US and Israeli strikes on military and nuclear targets.

Restarting major attacks on Iran would likely hurt Republicans in the November 3 midterm elections, as it would worsen the energy crisis and raise gas prices in the US, while Netanyahu and his coalition may benefit in the October 27 Knesset elections.

Trump and Netanyahu at the White House on July 7, 2025 (White House photo)

“Bibi’s got an election before the midterms. He believes his strength is being a wartime prime minister,” one US official told Axios reporter Barak Ravid, who is a former IDF intelligence officer.

The report also said that in meetings with his security officials, Netanyahu has claimed that it was Trump who brought up the possibility of striking Iran before the elections. Multiple US media outlets recently reported that the US president was considering launching a bombing campaign before the midterms, but he has said publicly that he won’t.

Ravid reported that in the conversations, Netanyahu has made his usual claims about concerns regarding Iran’s nuclear program. One source said US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and US Central Command leadership were the strongest supporters of restarting strikes, while other officials prefer ramping up economic pressure.

The US is still enforcing a blockade of Iranian ports, and Iran has dramatically ramped up attacks on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz after Trump had repeatedly claimed the US was in control of the strait since more oil was coming out, but the oil shipments are on the decline.

If you liked this article, please support Antiwar.com.
We are 100% reader-supported.

Dave DeCamp is the news editor of Antiwar.com, follow him on Twitter @decampdave.

White House discussed plans to attack Iran before elections

October 9, 2026

,Andre Damon@Andre__Damon, WDSWS, 9 Oct, 2026

In this photograph released by the U.S. Navy, military planes stand on the flight deck of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, July 4, 2024, in the South China Sea. [AP Photo/Seaman Ryan Holloway

The Trump administration is preparing a major new bombing campaign against Iran, according to reports published Wednesday and Thursday by The Atlantic, Axios, NBC News, the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times.

While reports published in the last two weeks indicated that Trump was making plans to attack after the November 3 midterm elections, the latest reports indicate Trump could launch the attacks even sooner. “The White House has asked the Pentagon to develop strike options against Iranian targets that could be exercised ahead of the midterms,” The Atlantic magazine reported Wednesday afternoon, citing two administration officials.

Next month’s election takes place amid broad popular opposition to the war. Trump said in his September 22 address to the United Nations that Iran was “waiting to see how I do in the midterm election.” He added: “I gave absolutely no credence and will not give credence to the election when it comes to Iran. It doesn’t even enter my mind.”

Axios reported Wednesday evening that, according to US officials, the Pentagon had instructed the military command in charge of the war “several days ago to conclude preparations for resuming major combat operations in Iran.” If combat resumes, Axios wrote, it is “expected to include massive bombing of Iranian energy, infrastructure and nuclear targets” and would most likely involve the Israeli military.

Trump said of a deal with Iran at a rally in San Antonio, Texas, on Wednesday night: “I think the deal isn’t really something that I want to do, but they’re willing to offer us anything to stop.”

The new bombing would intensify the war of aggression that the United States and Israel opened against Iran on February 28. According to official figures cited by Al Jazeera, the US and Israeli militaries had killed 3,527 people inside Iran by August 28 without bringing down the government in Tehran or forcing it to accept Washington’s terms. Washington has answered each failure by preparing a larger assault.Available from Mehring BooksThe struggle against imperialism and for workers’ power in IranA pamphlet by Keith Jones

The New York Times wrote Thursday that the Pentagon, “on Mr. Trump’s orders,” had developed plans to strike “Iran’s drone and missile arsenal, energy facilities and other military sites.” The plans “center on a short, intense campaign lasting about three days,” the Times reported.

“U.S. military commanders are ready to begin larger operations in the coming days, in case the president shifts again,” according to the Times.

Axios reported Thursday that US officials had briefed the chief of staff of the Israeli military, Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, on Tuesday about preparations “for the possibility of resuming major combat operations against Iran within the next three weeks.”

“A fresh aircraft-carrier strike group and Marine expeditionary unit are steaming toward the Middle East, and the Pentagon is weighing sending additional air-defense equipment and munitions to bases in the region,” the Journal reported Thursday, citing officials familiar with the planning. The Associated Press reported October 1 that the United States was “dispatching roughly 9,000 troops aboard a group of ships.”

The assault on Iran is part of a worldwide offensive by American imperialism, aimed above all at Russia and China. Since the 1979 revolution that overthrew the US-backed Shah, Democratic and Republican administrations alike have sought to restore American control over Iran. The war is the latest in more than three decades of US wars, from the 1991 Persian Gulf War through the invasions of Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003.

Vice President JD Vance led a discussion of the plans at the Camp David presidential retreat on October 2, the Times reported.

US forces have not struck inside Iran since September 1, but they have kept up the blockade of Iran’s ports. The US military said October 5 that it had turned back 130 commercial ships since reimposing the blockade on July 14, and that it had “destroyed 13 commercial vessels” over the previous 12 weeks.

Socialism AI Logo

Socialism AI

by the WSWSSocialismAI.com

Questions about this article? Ask Socialism AI

What was the 1979 Iranian Revolution and why has the US sought to reverse it ever since, through both Democratic and Republican administrations?How does the bipartisan support for military spending bills and Iran sanctions show that the Democratic Party shares the same imperialist aims as the Republicans rather than opposing the war?How does this planned bombing campaign against Iran connect to US strategy toward Russia and China, and what does that tell us about the drive toward a wider war?

Ask more questions at SocialismAI.com

The war has killed 19 US service members and wounded more than 800, the Associated Press reported Tuesday.

In an AP-NORC poll conducted September 24-28, 69 percent of Americans said the war in Iran “has not been worth fighting.”

All factions of the US political establishment support the aim of subjugating Iran to US domination. The Democratic Party has criticized Trump’s conduct of the war on the grounds that he has failed to secure the interests of American imperialism. Senator Mark Kelly, an Arizona Democrat, declared on ABC’s “This Week” on September 27: “We can’t leave the Strait in the hands of the Iranians.”

Senator Ruben Gallego, another Arizona Democrat, said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth “is one of the most important reasons why we’re losing this war in Iran,” in a CNN interview his office released October 1.

These criticisms are accompanied by accusations that Trump has been insufficiently aggressive toward Russia and China. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said on the House floor on September 16, referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin: “Many of us wonder why the President has been so reluctant to aggressively confront the bully of Eastern Europe.” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and seven other Democratic senators said in a September 22 statement, ahead of a state visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping: “We can’t let President Xi leave stronger than when he arrived. That is not diplomacy, it’s weakness.”

Jeffries and 114 other House Democrats voted for the National Defense Authorization Act on December 10, 2025, and 149 House Democrats voted on January 22, five weeks before the war began, for an $839 billion military appropriations bill. On September 16, 58 House Democrats, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, voted with the Republicans for a bill giving Trump new powers to impose tariffs aimed at Russia and extending sanctions on Iran through 2031.

With the complicity of media and Democrats, Trump prepares major escalation of Iran war

October 5, 2026

Andre Damon@Andre__Damon, WSWS, 5 Oct

In this photograph released by the U.S. Navy, military planes stand on the flight deck of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, July 4, 2024, in the South China Sea. [AP Photo/Seaman Ryan Holloway]

The events of the past week leave no doubt that the Trump administration, w complicity of the entire US political establishment, is preparing a major escalation of the Iran war. Having failed to achieve its objectives through a massive bombardment and then a blockade of the country, the White House is preparing a new and desperate gambit, potentially involving the deployment of ground troops or even the use of nuclear weapons.With the complicity of media and Democrats, Trump prepares major escalation of Iran war

The greatest danger is the chasm between the scale of what is being prepared and the public’s awareness of it. One month before the 2026 midterm elections, Trump’s conspiracy to escalate the war is being greeted with a wall of silence by the US media—which devoted just minutes to the war in this weekend’s Sunday talk shows—and by the Democratic Party, which has done nothing to alert the public to the renewed onslaught against Iran that the administration is preparing.

On September 22, US President Donald Trump threatened in his speech before the United Nations to “annihilate the Islamic Republic, and do it quickly.” His threat followed a secret White House meeting, reported by the journalist Seymour Hersh on June 10, at which Trump spoke “about a nuclear option that could perhaps bring a quicker end to the war.”

These threats cannot be dismissed as bluster. Trump is the president of the United States and has already killed thousands of people in the months-long bombardment of Iran. The forces now converging on the Persian Gulf give him the means to carry out his threats. Nothing would be more dangerous than complacency.

After seven months of war, US imperialism has failed to achieve its aims of dominating the Strait of Hormuz, militarily defeating Iran and overthrowing its government. The administration is improvising, desperately seeking a way out of the political disaster the war has produced. But its improvisation is driven by the logic of events. American imperialism cannot accept defeat in the Persian Gulf, and each failure becomes the basis for an ever-greater escalation.

Last week, the Wall Street Journal and the Associated Press reported that the White House had sent a third aircraft carrier to the Middle East. The USS Theodore Roosevelt left San Diego on September 27, followed the next day by the amphibious assault ship USS Makin Island with about 2,200 Marines. They will join the carrier USS George Washington and more than 50,000 US troops deployed across the region.

Trump “has told aides he expects to resume bombing Iran after the November midterms,” the Journal reported September 25. He was briefed in August on options including “sending in ground forces to seize Iranian islands near Hormuz,” the Journal reported last month.

The deployment of amphibious assault ships along with thousands of Marines is particularly ominous. They are the means of seizing territory, and the next phase of the war may include landings on the islands near Hormuz, at the Kharg Island oil terminal or at Iran’s nuclear sites.

The administration’s top national security officials met Friday at Camp David, the presidential retreat, “to discuss next steps in the Iran war and the Saudi-Houthi conflict in Yemen,” Axios reported that night. The last similar meeting, Axios noted, was in June 2025, just days before Israel and then the United States attacked Iran. The new US military deployments targeting Iran parallels a renewed offensive by Saudi Arabia, supported by the United States, in Yemen.

The Pentagon confirmed Sunday that all US bombers at Britain’s Fairford air base, used for strikes on Iran, had been flown back to the United States. The withdrawal followed British Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s claim on September 30 that Iran “played a part” in an alleged plot against the base. The unproven allegation provides a ready-made pretext for escalation.

The war against Iran is part of a broader global offensive by US imperialism, centrally targeting Russia and China. Significantly, the plans to expand the Iran war accompany a sharp intensification of NATO’s war on Russia in Ukraine, which threatens at any moment to erupt into direct warfare between nuclear-armed states.

Each president since the 1979 Iranian revolution, Democratic and Republican, has worked to bring Iran back under American domination. Trump’s war against Iran is the latest stage of a 35-year offensive to subjugate the Middle East and Central Asia: the Gulf War of 1991, the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, the destruction of Libya, the proxy war in Syria and Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

Amid overwhelming popular opposition to the war and the ensuing surge in the cost of living, particularly of energy, the Democratic Party is expected to make significant gains on November 3. It is determined, however, to ensure that any electoral repudiation of Trump does not lead to a let-up in the drive by US imperialism in the Middle East.

US Coast Guard Says It Intercepted Ship Carrying Fuel to Cuba as US Continues Enforcing Ramped-Up Blockade

October 5, 2026

The escalation of the US oil embargo on Cuba has pushed the country into a devastating humanitarian crisis

by Dave DeCamp | October 4, 2026 at 4:09 pm ET | Cub

The US Coast Guard said Friday that its forces intercepted a ship that was attempting to bring fuel to Cuba, as the US continues to enforce a ramped-up oil embargo on the country, which has caused a devastating humanitarian crisis.

The Coast Guard said that the incident occurred in early September, when a “Coast Guard tactical team” boarded the M/V Grace, a 300-foot-long container ship, in the Caribbean Sea.

Photo of the interception released by the Coast Guard

The Coast Guard said it then escorted the ship to Mexico, where Mexican authorities found fuel stored in the ship’s ballast tanks. It said that earlier in the summer, US Coast Guard personnel stopped and boarded the M/V Jaira Provider, another vessel it accused of carrying fuel bound for Cuba.

The Trump administration ramped up the oil embargo on Cuba after it attacked Venezuela to abduct President Nicolas Maduro in January, which gave the US the power to cut off Venezuelan oil shipments to the island nation. The US also pressured Mexico to end its oil exports to Cuba.

The embargo has caused daily blackouts, which have been detrimental to the civilian population of Cuba. Cuban doctors told The New York Times back in March that patients were dying due to the US blockade, as the conditions at hospitals caused by the fuel shortages were leading to preventable deaths.

The escalated blockade has come with threats and preparations for military action against Cuba. CBS News recently reported that the US Military has been working to establish “the groundwork for potential action around Cuba.”

If you liked this article, please support Antiwar.com.
We are 100% reader-supported.

Dave DeCamp is the news editor of Antiwar.com, follow him on Twitter @decampdave.

Trump administration sends aircraft carrier and up to 10,000 troops toward Iran, threatens to resume bombing

October 3, 2026
Andre Damon@Andre__Damon, WSWS, 3 Oct, 2026

The USS Theodore Roosevelt, left, and the USS Carl M. Levin prepare for a refueling in the Pacific Ocean, Nov. 16, 2025. [Photo: Navy Petty Officer 3rd Class Aaron Haro Gonzalez ]

The Trump administration is sending the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt and three amphibious warships carrying about 2,000 Marines to the Middle East. The ships will reinforce the US forces arrayed against Iran with as many as 10,000 sailors and Marines, the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg News reported Thursday, citing US officials.

The deployment follows US President Donald Trump’s threat before the UN General Assembly on September 22 to “annihilate the Islamic Republic and do it quickly” and to “drive them into hell with no chance of survival and no hope of future greatness or generations.” Two days later, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the General Assembly that Iran’s “murderous regime will be toppled,” declaring: “This evil regime will fall, and we will all celebrate that day.”

The buildup puts the White House on a course to massively accelerate the war following the US midterm elections on November 3, which are expected to reflect the overwhelming unpopularity of the war among workers and young people. But while the Democrats may be the beneficiaries of the elections, they have pledged, like Trump, to ensure the subjugation of Iran to American interests.

The Journal reported September 25 that Trump “has told aides he expects to resume bombing Iran after the November midterms.” The Journal wrote Thursday, citing US officials, that the ships would arrive by late November.

Bloomberg, citing a US official, wrote that the deployment “gives American commanders more options if President Donald Trump chooses to escalate attacks on Iran.”

Axios quoted a US official Thursday as saying the region “could potentially have up to three aircraft carrier strike groups. This is much more firepower.”

The Roosevelt sailed from San Diego on Sunday, and the USS Makin Island amphibious group followed on Monday. Whether the Roosevelt will add to the carriers already in the region or replace one of them has not been decided, Axios reported, citing a second official. The United States already has more than 50,000 troops in the region.

In recent weeks the Trump administration has also sent two more Patriot missile batteries to Saudi Arabia and Qatar, Axios reported Thursday, to protect energy facilities “in case President Trump decides to resume major combat operations against Iran.”

Asked by reporters on Wednesday about Iran’s leaders, Trump said, according to CBS News: “We have to make that decision: We blow them up or make a deal.”Available from Mehring BooksThe struggle against imperialism and for workers’ power in IranA pamphlet by Keith Jones

On Thursday, as he left the White House, Trump said: “They’ll either sign a very fair deal, or they won’t exist any longer,” The Hill reported.

In an interview with Time magazine conducted Monday and published Thursday, Trump was asked whether he would “ramp up bombing after the midterms.” He answered: “Possible.”

Pressed again, Trump said: “We have a lot of weapons. You know, we’ve been stocking up for the last six months.” Reminded of his threat at the UN to “annihilate” Iran, he said: “Yeah, I would do that. It’s possible.”

Dominant sections of the US media are agitating for an escalation of the war.

In an editorial headlined “The Battle of Hormuz Is Turning,” the Journal’s editors declared Thursday that the US military had “turned around the battle of the Strait of Hormuz.” They wrote: “This is what progress looks like: Iran’s oil is blocked while the world’s oil increasingly gets through.”

The editorial concluded: “The challenge now is to sustain the pressure and push the US tactical advantage to accomplish strategic objectives—finishing the nuclear program or the regime itself.”

At least five tankers have come under attack in or near the Strait since Monday, the shipping news site Riviera reported Friday. On Thursday the Kuwaiti supertanker Kazimah III caught fire after it was struck by what the UK Maritime Trade Operations center called “an unknown projectile.”

The US Navy has blockaded Iran’s ports since July. By Wednesday it had redirected 125 commercial ships, according to the US military, and on September 26 Trump boasted that the blockade was “a wall of steel.”

Reuters reported Thursday, citing three senior Iranian officials and an insider, that Iran is preparing “a broader and more forceful response if the United States resumes large-scale military attacks.” According to the news agency, “Senior commanders are reviewing plans to expand potential targets beyond US-linked assets to countries that support US military operations and possibly to locations outside the Middle East.”

Official figures compiled by Al Jazeera count at least 3,527 people killed in Iran by US and Israeli bombing between February 28, when the two powers launched the war, and August 28. By September 28, the US military had counted 19 American service members dead and 861 wounded.

Socialism AI Logo

Socialism AI

by the WSWSSocialismAI.com

Questions about this article? Ask Socialism AI

What does it mean concretely for the working class when war preparations like this are timed around an election cycle?Why do both the Democrats and Republicans agree on confronting Iran even while attacking Trump’s handling of the war?What is the historical origin of US hostility toward Iran, going back to the 1953 coup against Mossadegh and the 1979 revolution?

Ask more questions at SocialismAI.com

Leading Democrats spent the past week attacking Trump for losing the war and for “weakness” toward China.

Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona told CNN on Wednesday that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth should be “figuring out how to win this war in Iran.”

Democratic Representative Jake Auchincloss of Massachusetts accused Trump of losing the war in an interview with CNN on September 25. Trump, he said, had sent Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping a message “of appeasement and weakness.”

In remarks on Capitol Hill about Xi’s state visit last week, aired Sunday on “Fox News Sunday,” Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut denounced Trump for “feting and celebrating Xi while he is aiding Iran, which is trying to kill our sons and daughters.” He said he was “shocked and deeply alarmed that the president, in effect, is kowtowing to him and failing to release the money that Taiwan needs to defend itself.”

Democratic Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona, interviewed Sunday on ABC’s “This Week,” declared: “We can’t leave the Strait in the hands of the Iranians.”

The buildup against Iran is proceeding alongside the escalation of the US-NATO war against Russia, which Moscow has answered with the threat to use nuclear weapons if NATO moves to cut off Kaliningrad, the Russian exclave on the Baltic Sea between Poland and Lithuania.

“Russia would be ready to use all its arsenal, including nuclear weapons, to defend its territory if NATO countries try to isolate Kaliningrad region from the rest of the country,” the Russian embassy in Ireland wrote on September 29.

Russian President Vladimir Putin repeated the threat Thursday at the annual meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club, a Russian foreign-policy forum. “If it comes to a direct attack on the Russian Federation—in this case, Kaliningrad, although it could potentially involve other territories as well—the question of Russia using all the weapons at its disposal would inevitably and immediately arise,” he said.

Asked about Russia’s warning at a Euronews conference in Brussels on Wednesday, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte responded: “We will defend every inch of NATO territory.”

The World Socialist Web Site is the voice of the working class and the leadership of the international socialist movement. We rely entirely on the support of our readers. Please donate today!

As Iran War Drags On, Trump Plans to Send Third Aircraft Carrier and Thousands More Troops to Middle East

October 2, 2026

USS Theodore Roosevelt strike group

The aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt and its accompanying strike group are seen in a January 25, 2020 photo.

(Photo by US Navy Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Anthony Rivera)

“Either they’ll do something very proper and smart, or they won’t be around very long,” Trump said of Iran’s government.

Brett Wilkins

Cpommon Dreams, Oct 01, 2026

The Pentagon is preparing to dramatically expand the American military presence in the Middle East as President Donald Trump weighs renewed attacks on Iran, with thousands of additional troops and a third aircraft carrier being readied for deployment, even as the conflict he has repeatedly declared “over” or “won” threatens to erupt into a new and potentially broader phase.

The Washington Post reported Thursday that the Pentagon is preparing options that could put as many as three US aircraft carriers and their accompanying warships in the Middle East.

RECOMMENDED…

Donald Trump speaks

‘Do I Blow the Entire Nation Up?’: Trump Says He’s in ‘Deciding Mode’ on Iran War

John Fetterman

‘Never Fails to Disappoint’: Fetterman Joins GOP to Keep Trump’s Iran War Going

According to The Associated Press, around 9,000 additional sailors and Marines are being dispatched aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier strike group and the USS Makin Island amphibious readiness group. The buildup could push the number of US personnel in the region above 20,000 by late October.

The Roosevelt is being sent to relieve the USS George Washington, while a third carrier, the USS George HW Bush, is also already in the region.

The new deployment plans come as diplomacy between Washington and Tehran remains stalled, and as Trump has repeatedly threatened to resume large-scale military action—including the total annihilation of the nation of over 90 million people—after the November midterm elections.

“Either they’ll do something very proper and smart, or they won’t be around very long,” Trump said of the Iranian government Thursday in Denton, Texas. “Frankly, I hate to see that, but they won’t be around very long.”

Iran, meanwhile, has reportedly begun preparing for a more expansive retaliation should the United States launch another major attack in the illegal US-Israeli war of choice against the Middle East nation.

Hamidreza Azizi, a senior Iran analyst at the International Crisis Group, told Reuters Thursday that the Iranian government seems “determined not to respond symbolically to a symbolic move and instead to escalate in the ⁠hope of reestablishing deterrence.”

Republican National Committee Co-Chair Lara Trump—the president’s daughter-in-law—warned during a Wednesday interview with British journalist Harry Cole that the increasingly protracted Iran War could not only tarnish Trump’s legacy, but could also cost Republicans next month’s midterm elections.

“Well, it’s possible,” Trump—who campaigned as the “peace president” on a promise of no new wars—said of the midterm risks Thursday on his way to Texas, before adding that “it should help because Iran will not have a nuclear weapon.”

The intelligence consensus of every US administration since former President George W. Bush—including during both of Trump’s terms—has been that Iran has not been trying to develop nuclear weapons.

When War Crimes Become Normal: The Price of Impunity

September 30, 2026

A child in a hospital bed in Iran after being injured in a bombing.

In this picture obtained by AFP from the Iranian news agency Tasnim on September 2, 2026 a child lies on a hospital bed receiving treatment following injuries from an overnight strike in Kuhestak, Sirik County, in Iran’s southern Hormozgan province on September 2, 2026.

(Photo by Morteza Akhondi/Tasnim News/AFP via Getty Images)

If we truly believe that all human life has equal value, then we must demand that those who order and carry out attacks on civilians face the same scrutiny and consequences, whoever they are.

Barzin Jafartash Amiri

Sep 29, 2026, Common Dreams

On Tuesday, September 1, 2026, the United States military struck a home in the town of Kuhestak, in Sirik County, southern Iran, where a wedding was underway, killing four people and wounding more than 50. The youngest victim was 4-year-old Amir Ali Karimi. Asked about the strike, US Vice President JD Vance told reporters: “What I can say with 100% confidence is that, unlike the IRGC, the United States never targets civilians in combat. We never will do that. We never have done that.” However, he added, “Sometimes, things happen.”

It’s worth remembering that the campaign the United States and Israel waged against Iran—launched without United Nations Security Council authorization—opened with a strike on the office of Iran’s Supreme Leader that killed him along with his daughter, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, and his 14-month-old granddaughter. Roughly an hour or two later, the US struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh elementary school in Minab with Tomahawk cruise missiles, killing 156 people, including 120 schoolchildren between the ages of six and 13. That same day, an attack on the small town of Lamerd used Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM)—munitions that burst in midair and scatter thousands of tungsten fragments—killing at least 21 people, including four children, among them 2-year-old Avina Barzegar, and wounding 100 more. In the months since, the US and Israel have struck not only military sites but universities, bridges, power plants, police stations, and even desalination plants serving remote islands in southern Iran. Whatever assurances Vance offers, the record is clear that the United States has a long history of striking civilians.

RECOMMENDED…

Joint US-Israeli attacks damage Gandi Hospital in Tehran

Amnesty Says US-Israeli Attacks With Indiscriminate Weapons in Tehran May Have Been War Crimes

Funeral held for children who lost their lives in US-Israeli attack on Iranian Primary School

UN Experts Say US War Crimes Likely in Iran School, Sports Complex Massacres

Of course none of this is new. More than two years have now passed since Israel launched its full-scale assault on Gaza, backed fully by the United States and most Western governments. Over those two years the world has watched strikes on hospitals, schools, and universities, the shooting of civilians, even an assault captured on camera—and despite an International Criminal Court arrest warrant for Israel’s prime minister, no action has been taken either to enforce that warrant or to halt the war. It was hardly surprising that a year-plus of unanswered war crimes in Gaza—what many now call a genocide—normalized the same conduct elsewhere. Israel applied much the same pattern in Lebanon, violating that country’s sovereignty to bomb schools, apartment buildings, universities, and villages. The absence of any serious response to crimes broadcast live to the world sent every power on Earth a clear message: If you are strong enough, you can commit any crime—including the crime of crimes.

Isn’t it time that those responsible for striking a bridge, a wedding, a power plant, a desalination plant, be held to account?

President Donald Trump himself has, through his own public statements, documented attacks that could easily amount to war crimes. In one Truth Social post, he wrote, “A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again.” In another, he shared footage of the strike that brought down Karaj’s unfinished B1 bridge—a civilian structure, not yet even complete, hit on Sizdah Bedar, the 13th day of Nowruz, when most Iranians are out picnicking in nature and many families were gathered under and around the bridge. The strike was a so-called double tap: A second missile hit after rescue workers arrived to help the wounded, killing two more and injuring several others. In all, 13 people were killed and 95 wounded.

This scale of targeting civilians, met with so little response from the media or the international community, is itself a troubling kind of normalization—one we cannot afford to treat with indifference. Imagine, for a moment, that Iran had bombed the White House on a holiday morning, killing the American president along with members of his family, and then struck an elementary school in Texas, killing more than 120 American students along with their teachers. How would American society, and the West more broadly, have responded? Would the dead children be called a “necessary action” or “mistake”? Or would the entire West have mobilized to respond to such an atrocity?

This same Western indifference to the deaths of people in the Global South—particularly at American hands—is visible in the words of Afghanistan’s former president, Hamid Karzai. Asked recently why he, perhaps alone among Afghan leaders, had wept in public, Karzai spoke of “our national helplessness before powers that had come in the name of helping Afghanistan,” and recalled asking American officials a simple question: If their bombs killed Afghan children, was that terrorism? They told him no—terrorism, he said they told him, is when American interests are put at risk.

This becomes painfully concrete when you consider that the Sirik wedding was only the latest entry in a long, grim record of American strikes on wedding celebrations across Afghanistan, Iraq, and Yemen going back more than two decades—a pattern trackers have documented since at least December 2001.

Isn’t it time that those responsible for striking a bridge, a wedding, a power plant, a desalination plant, be held to account? Don’t the citizens of a country whose president launched a war on another nation without UN authorization, and whose forces have committed numerous documented war crimes in the process, bear some responsibility for holding their own leaders accountable? Would the West have stayed this indifferent if a wedding, or a school, had been hit at home—or would it have moved heaven and Earth to bring the perpetrators to justice? These are the questions that demand an answer. The world cannot continue to condemn violence selectively while treating the deaths of civilians in the Global South as an unfortunate but acceptable consequence of geopolitics.

Every time a war crime is ignored, the threshold for the next one becomes lower. Every time accountability is abandoned, impunity becomes stronger. If we truly believe that all human life has equal value, then we must demand that those who order and carry out attacks on civilians face the same scrutiny and consequences, whoever they are. The first step toward ending war-crime normalization is refusing to look away.

As Trump rejects Iranian cease-fire proposal, Wall Street Journal reports plans to resume bombing after midterms

September 28, 2026

Andre Damon@Andre__Damon. WSWS, 28 Sep, 2026

US President Donald Trump on Saturday publicly rejected an Iranian proposal for a seven-day cease-fire, after the Wall Street Journal reported Friday night that he “has told aides he expects to resume bombing Iran after the November midterms.”

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi presented Iran’s position to reporters Friday outside the UN Security Council in New York. Within seven days of US acceptance, Iran would reopen the Strait of Hormuz and begin nuclear talks, in exchange for the lifting of the US naval blockade, the release of part of Iran’s frozen assets, the waiving of oil sanctions and a cease-fire extending to Lebanon, as the Associated Press and Al Jazeera reported.

Trump told reporters Saturday: “I’m rejecting their deal. They want to make a deal where they open the strait immediately because they are losing so badly.”

The United States “has told Iran and the mediators that Trump has no intention of lifting the maritime embargo,” according to the Journal. Washington, the Journal wrote, “believes economic pressure will eventually force Tehran to sign an agreement with terms that are favorable to Washington and the Arab states along the Persian Gulf.”

Citing US officials, the Journal reported that Trump “has told his staff that he sees a renewed bombing campaign as likely.” The Journal wrote that “the level of strikes Trump is contemplating couldn’t be determined” and that his views “could be affected by the results of the midterms.”

Asked by Fox News on Sunday whether strikes in the coming weeks remained an option, Trump said they were “possible.”

The Journal’s report gives concrete content to Trump’s threat, in his speech to the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday, to “annihilate the Islamic Republic and do it quickly” and to “drive them into hell with no chance of survival and no hope of future greatness or generations.”

The journalist Seymour Hersh wrote on June 10 he had been told that in “a recent secret meeting in the White House,” Trump “began speculating, albeit vaguely, about a nuclear option that could perhaps bring a quicker end to the war.”

On April 7, Trump wrote on Truth Social: “A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again.” Asked that day whether Trump would use nuclear weapons, then-White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt did not rule it out. “Only the President knows where things stand and what he will do,” she said.Available from Mehring BooksThe struggle against imperialism and for workers’ power in IranA pamphlet by Keith Jones

Despite unleashing a full-scale aerial bombardment of Iran, the United States has failed to achieve its objectives. Announcing the war on February 28, Trump vowed to “raze their missile industry to the ground” and told Iranians to “take over your government” once the bombing was finished. Nearly seven months later, the government in Tehran remains in power, and Iranian forces have kept firing missiles at US bases.

The United States and Israel assassinated Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, on February 28, and in March Iran’s Assembly of Experts named his son, Mojtaba Khamenei, to succeed him. On July 17, Iranian forces killed three US soldiers in a missile attack on the Muwaffaq Salti base in Jordan.

Al Jazeera reported August 28 that US and Israeli forces had attacked Iran at least 3,580 times, according to the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data project, and had killed no fewer than 3,527 people there, according to official figures.

On September 17, the UN Human Rights Council’s fact-finding mission on Iran reported “reasonable grounds to believe” that the United States had carried out the February 28 attack on a primary school in the southern city of Minab, killing 157 people, among them 123 children, and that the attack was a war crime.

What will be the next stage of escalation? Will Trump deploy ground troops or use nuclear weapons?

On June 11, Trump wrote on Truth Social that “we will be taking Kharg Island,” Iran’s chief oil terminal, “and other oil infrastructure points, and assume total control of their Oil and Gas Markets, much like we have with Venezuela….” Trump met his top aides in the White House Situation Room on July 14 to discuss sending ground troops to seize the island, the Journal reported the next day.

More than 50,000 American troops were deployed in the region, the military news site Task & Purpose reported August 30, and units of the 82nd Airborne Division have had their deployment extended to 12 months. On Sunday morning, Trump shared on Truth Social a video in which Fox News host Mark Levin said “there is no reason [Kharg] Island is off the table….”

The cease-fire that began in April collapsed in July. On July 7, after three commercial ships were attacked in the Strait of Hormuz, US forces bombed more than 80 sites in Iran, and the next day Trump pronounced the cease-fire “over.” Since July 14, the US Navy has enforced a blockade of Iran’s entire coastline, which under international law is an act of war.

US forces have attacked Iran repeatedly since, including on September 1, when they killed at least five people at a wedding in Kuhestak on Iran’s southern coast, among them a child, according to Iranian media.

Socialism AI Logo

Socialism AI

by the WSWSSocialismAI.com

Questions about this article? Ask Socialism AI

What is the strategic reason the US ruling class wants to dominate Iran and control the Strait of Hormuz, beyond just Iran’s own oil?How does this war on Iran connect to the broader US confrontation with China and Russia that the article mentions?Can you explain what it means historically when both Democrats and Republicans support the same war, and what this shows about the two-party system?

Ask more questions at SocialismAI.com

Iran is a strategic battlefield in a developing global war against Russia and China. CNN reported Friday, citing unnamed sources, that satellite imagery from Chinese groups helped Iran carry out the July 17 attack in Jordan. According to the Journal, Trump “is reluctant to resume major combat operations” partly because the United States “wants to reserve dwindling munitions for other contingencies.”

French President Emmanuel Macron said Thursday that France would send “soldiers, radar systems and defense systems” to protect Saudi Arabia’s Yanbu oil terminal on the Red Sea, which Yemen’s Iran-allied Houthis have attacked with missiles.

In a CNN poll published September 22, 78 percent of respondents said Trump was not doing enough to end the war, and 76 percent said it had not been worth the cost.

Trump’s approval rating was 34.6 percent on Thursday, according to the FiftyPlusOne average compiled by the analyst G. Elliott Morris, the lowest for any president this close to a midterm election since scientific polling began in the 1930s.

The Democrats’ criticisms of the administration center on its failure to secure US imperialism’s aims in Iran. On ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday, Democratic Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona said Trump had gone to war “without a plan.” He added: “We can’t leave the Strait in the hands of the Iranians. They can’t be allowed to get a nuclear weapon.”

On Thursday, 21 Democratic senators, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer among them, wrote in a statement on Trump’s Washington summit that day with Chinese President Xi Jinping that the United States “should never have launched the reckless and illegal war against Iran.” In the same statement they complained that “Beijing has exploited the conflict to purchase discounted Iranian oil, while U.S. munitions and strategic stockpiles have been expended at alarming rates.” Schumer told the Senate that day that Trump had acted “sort of as a supplicant” toward Xi and “needs to finally show some backbone.”

On September 16, 58 Democrats helped the House pass a bill that lets Trump impose tariffs as steep as 100 percent on the countries that buy the most Russian oil and gas, chiefly China and India. The bill also extends US sanctions on Iran.

Previously, on September 1, House Democrats voted 176 to 29 for a stopgap bill that keeps the government, the Pentagon included, funded through December 11. In January, 149 House Democrats had voted for the $839 billion military budget that has paid for the war since February 28.

Whatever the result on November 3, the Democratic and Republican parties alike support the war on Iran and the aim of subordinating the country to US domination.

Democrat Files 26 Impeachment Articles Against Trump Over War, ICE, Corruption

September 28, 2026

“Trump is clearly the most impeachable President our country has ever endured,” Rep. Steve Cohen said.

By Sharon Zhang , Truthout Published September 25, 2026

President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump before welcoming China’s President Xi Jinping and his wife Peng Liyuan for tea at the White House, in Washington, DC, on September 25, 2026.

Truthout is a vital news source and a living history of political struggle. If you think our work is valuable, support us with a donation of any size.

A House Democrat has filed articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, calling him the “most impeachable president” in U.S. history and accusing him of high crimes and misdemeanors ranging from his war on Iran to his schemes to enrich himself and his allies while in office.

House Judiciary Committee member Rep. Steve Cohen, of Tennessee, introduced 26 impeachment articles on Thursday, covering a broad range of actions from the president since his return to office last year.

Two of the articles focus on Trump’s military aggression, in Iran and in his “extrajudicial killings in the international waters of Venezuela.” Numerous articles are focused on the administration’s actions relating to his mass deportation and anti-immigration agenda, including the administration’s defiance of court orders, imprisonment of immigrants in a notorious torture camp in El Salvador, and deployment of the National Guard to U.S. cities.

Other articles focus on Trump’s attempts to punish his political enemies; his attacks on the press; his alleged misappropriations of federal funds; and his various corruption schemes, including his “profiting personally and directly from the presidency.”

“Trump is clearly the most impeachable President our country has ever endured. His continued presence in office is a danger to our democracy. That the sycophantic Republican majority in Congress is derelict in its duty does not mean that I must abandon my responsibilities,” said Cohen in a statement on the articles. “When historians write about this period, and our constituents ask who stood up to President Trump’s lawlessness, this resolution is the answer.”

Related Story

Sen. Tammy Baldwin questions Director of the National Institutes of Health Jayanta Bhattacharya during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building, on June 10, 2025, in Washington, D.C.

Op-Ed

|

Politics & Elections

Don’t Be Fooled: GOP Scuffle Over NIH Grants Doesn’t Mean Science Has Prevailed

Trump has backed down for now in his new bid to control research grants, but his tune could change after the midterms. By Sasha Abramsky , Truthout

September 24, 2026

Like previous attempts to impeach Trump, the articles are doomed to fail under the Republican-controlled Congress.

The latest attempt, by Rep. Al Green (D-Texas), garnered 147 votes to advance the measure, all from Democrats, in a vote earlier this month.

Eighteen Democrats joined Republicans in voting to table the articles, including some of the most conservative Democrats in the caucus like Representatives Jared Golden (D-Maine) and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez — who have also twice broken with their caucus to help buoy Republican priorities in recent weeks. Another 46 Democrats voted “present,” including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York).

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky) also recently introduced articles of impeachment against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. The eight articles focused on the U.S.’s military campaigns in Iran, Venezuela, Yemen, and in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean, while also accusing Hegseth of disregarding civilian safeguards and suppressing the speech of critics. Massie moved to force a House vote on the articles, but was blocked by GOP leaders.

A majority of Americans say that Hegseth should face impeachment, however. Recent polling found that a slim majority, 51 percent, of U.S. voters say that Hegseth should be impeached, The Economist/YouGov found.

25 Years of Truthout: An important fundraising appeal

This September, Truthout is celebrating 25 years of publication. For over two decades, we have been a trusted source for fiercely independent journalism thanks to readers like you.

Looking to the next 25 years, we launched a special fundraising campaign. We still need to raise $16,000.

We are asking for your support at this juncture because we face greater threats than ever before in our organizational history. Trump and his MAGA allies are determined to control the information ecosystem, and movement-based organizations are subject to dangerous censorship and scrutiny.

If you can support Truthout with a one-time or monthly donation, you will make a significant impact on our work and our legacy. Anything you can do makes a difference!

about:blank This article is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), and you are free to share and republish under the terms of the license.

Sharon Zhang

Sharon Zhang is a news writer at Truthout covering international affairs, politics, and labor. She has a master’s degree in environmental studies. She can be found on Twitter and Bluesky.