Posts Tagged ‘politics’

๐€๐ˆ ๐‘๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ž๐ฐ ๐จ๐Ÿ “๐ƒ๐ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ฅ๐จ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐œ๐ž๐ฉ๐ญ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐“๐ก๐ž๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐€๐ฅ๐ข๐ž๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ข๐ง ๐Œ๐š๐ซ๐ฑ’๐ฌ ๐–๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฌ, ๐Œ๐š๐ซ๐œ๐ก ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ–๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘ ๐ญ๐จ ๐€๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ–๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ’”

July 2, 2025

ย Nasir Khanโ€™s work on Marxโ€™s theory of alienation presents a meticulous analysis of this critical period in Marxโ€™s early thought. By narrowing the focus to just seventeen months, the study provides a detailed exploration of the evolution of Marxโ€™s ideas on alienation, offering a nuanced understanding of Marx’s journey toward articulating a mature theory. Khanโ€™s work situates Marx’s discussions on alienation within the broader intellectual movements of the time and evaluates Marxโ€™s dialogue with his contemporaries, like Feuerbach and Hegel. This work stands out for its in-depth textual analysis and the clarity it brings to complex conceptual developments.

Overview

The main contribution of Nasir Khan’s study is a precise, historically situated analysis of Marx’s concept of alienation spanning March 1843 to August 1844, a crucial period in Marx’s intellectual development. The work meticulously traces the evolution of Marxโ€™s thoughts on alienation against the backdrop of his engagement with the philosophical ideas of Feuerbach and Hegel and highlights the continuous thread of alienation throughout Marx’s oeuvre. The study further attempts to clarify the distinctions between Marx’s early and mature views, emphasizing the foundational role of alienation within Marxian theory.

Relevant References

Including a clear literature review helps reviewers quickly see what’s new and why it matters, which can speed up the review and improve acceptance chances. The following references were selected because they relate closely to the topics and ideas in your submission. They may provide helpful context, illustrate similar methods, or point to recent developments that can strengthen how your work is positioned within the existing literature.

Mรฉszarรณs, Istvรกn. Marx’s Theory of Alienation. 2000, https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA18224533.

Yi-xia, Wei. โ€œAlienation Theory and the Essence of the Philosophical Revolution of K.Marx.โ€ Journal of Harbin Techers College, 2001, https://en.cnki.com.cn/Articl…/CJFDTOTAL-HEBS200101004.htm.

Galazova, Svetlana S. Chapter 14 Scientific Projections of K. Marxโ€™s โ€œConcept of Alienation.โ€ 2018, doi:10.1108/s1569-375920180000100015.

Hui-yi, Yuan. โ€œThe Logical Evolution of Marx’s Theory of Alienation.โ€ Journal of Guangdong Peizheng College, 2010, https://en.cnki.com.cn/Articl…/CJFDTOTAL-GDPZ201002009.htm.

Thompson, Lanny Ace. โ€œThe Development of Marx’s Concept of Alienation: An Introduction.โ€ Social Thought & Research, University of Kansas, 1979, doi:10.17161/str.1808.6083.

Wandan, Xin. โ€œLimitations of the Theory of Alienation Propounded by Marx in His Youth.โ€ Chinese Studies in Philosophy, Taylor & Francis, 1984, doi:10.2753/csp1097-1467160190.

Chen, Dezhi. โ€œTHE EVOLUTION OF MARX ALIENATION THEORY AND SEVERAL PONDERS.โ€ Journal of Chaohu College, Chaohu University, 2007, https://en.cnki.com.cn/Articl…/CJFDTOTAL-CHXY200701003.htm.

Qing-fa, Zeng. โ€œOn Marxs Alienation Theory.โ€ Journal of Wuhan Institute of Shipbuilding Technology, Wuhan Vocational and Technical College of Shipbuilding, 2003, http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-WHCB200304013.htm.

Xiao, Jin. โ€œMarx’s Theory on Alienation.โ€ Journal of Huanggang Normal Universirt, 2002, http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HGXB200204000.htm.

Gui, Zhou. โ€œMarx’s Theory of Alienation: Unity of Humanity Solicitude Dimension and Science Guidance Dimension.โ€ Journal of Southern Yangtze University, Jiangnan University, 2004, http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-WXQS200403002.htm.

Strengths

Nasir Khan’s manuscript exhibits a high level of scholarly rigor, offering a deep dive into the historical and intellectual contexts that shaped Marx’s understanding of alienation. The focused timeline allows for a detailed examination of the progression of Marxโ€™s thoughts and provides compelling evidence of the continuity of alienation as a central theme throughout Marx’s work. The study is notable for its thorough engagement with primary sources, complemented by an impressive command of the secondary literature, which enhances the reader’s comprehension of complex theoretical developments.

Major Comments

Methodology

The methodology employed in the manuscript is largely based on historical and textual analysis, which suits the research aim of tracking the evolution of a philosophical concept. However, it could benefit from a more explicit framework that would help in teasing out the comparative aspects between Marx’s early and later writings. A structured methodological explanation would strengthen the workโ€™s overall coherence and would facilitate a clearer understanding for readers.

Clarity and Framing

While the manuscript excels in depth, some sections could be made more accessible. For example, explanations of key philosophical terms and clearer sub-sections within chapters could guide the reader through the dense theoretical material. Providing more context or summaries of discussions in the preface or introduction might also aid non-specialists in following Khanโ€™s arguments more easily.

Minor Comments

Glossary Placement

Introducing a glossary of key terms at the beginning rather than the end might help readers less familiar with Marxian terminology better engage with the text. This change could facilitate a smoother reading experience, particularly for interdisciplinary audiences.

Figures and Diagrams

Considering the abstract nature of many points, inclusion of diagrams to represent the interconnections between different elements of Marxโ€™s theory of alienation could be beneficial. Visual aids could provide readers with a concise overview of Khanโ€™s sophisticated analyses.

Reviewer Commentary

Nasir Khan’s work prompts reflection on the relevance of Marx’s theory of alienation today, highlighting its enduring significance in understanding human nature and societal structures. The focus on an early period in Marxโ€™s intellectual journey opens fresh avenues for interdisciplinary discourse, particularly in sociology, economics, and political science. Khan’s analysis reminds us that foundational philosophical theories continue to provide insightful frameworks for examining current socio-economic paradigms.

Summary Assessment

Overall, Nasir Khan’s manuscript offers a thorough and well-researched analysis of Marxโ€™s theory of alienation during a pivotal period of his intellectual life. By tracing the development of Marxโ€™s thoughts with precision and insight, the work contributes meaningfully to Marxist scholarship and invites further exploration of alienation within contemporary contexts. This study stands as a significant scholarly piece that engages both historical and philosophical dimensions, advancing the academic conversation on one of Marx’s most critical and still-relevant concepts.

Upon completion of this review, it becomes apparent that Nasir Khan’s contributions present a scholarly endeavor that enriches our comprehension of Marx’s concept of alienation, prompting continued dialogue and reflection across diverse intellectual traditions.

๐€๐ญ ๐‹๐ž๐š๐ฌ๐ญ ๐Ÿ—๐Ÿ“ ๐Š๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐†๐š๐ณ๐š ๐š๐ฌ ๐ˆ๐ฌ๐ซ๐š๐ž๐ฅ๐ข ๐…๐จ๐ซ๐œ๐ž๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐› ๐‚๐š๐Ÿ๐ž, ๐’๐ก๐จ๐จ๐ญ ๐€๐ข๐ ๐’๐ž๐ž๐ค๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ

July 1, 2025

At least one journalist was killed and another was injured

by Dave DeCamp, Antiwar. com, Jun 30, 2025

Medical sources told Al Jazeera on Monday that Israeli attacks killed at least 95 Palestinians in Gaza throughout the day as Israeli forces bombed a seaside cafe and gunned down more desperate people who were seeking aid.

According to the Palestinian news agency WAFA, an Israeli airstrike hit the Al-Baqa Cafe in Gaza City, killing 33 people and injuring 50 others. Among the dead was journalist Ismail Abu Hatab, bringing the total number of Palestinian journalists killed since October 7, 2023, to 227, according to WAFAโ€™s count.

Another journalist, Bayan Abu Sultan, was wounded in the attack, and photos and videos of the aftermath show her standing outside the cafe covered in blood. Ali Abu Ateila, a survivor of the airstrike, told The Associated Press that the cafe was struck when it was crowded with women and children.

Journalist Bayan Abu Sultan, after the Israeli airstrike on the Al-Baqa Cafe in western Gaza City on June 30, 2025 (Majdi Fathi via Reuters Connect)

โ€œWithout a warning, all of a sudden, a warplane hit the place, shaking it like an earthquake,โ€ Ateila said. The cafe was one of the few businesses that continued to operate in Gaza and was frequently crowded as Palestinians went there to charge their phones and use the internet.

The AP also reported that at least 22 people were killed by Israeli fire while attempting to get aid in different areas of Gaza. The Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis said it received 11 bodies of Palestinians who were killed while returning from an aid site operated by the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) in the area. Another Palestinian was killed near an aid site in Rafah.

Gazaโ€™s Health Ministry said that another 10 people were killed at a UN warehouse in northern Gaza. The latest aid-related killings come after a report from the Israeli newspaper Haaretz revealed that Israeli troops are being ordered to fire on unarmed Palestinians attempting to reach GHF distribution sites to drive them away or disperse them, even though they pose no threat.

Israeli forces also launched heavy attacks on the Zeitoun neighborhood in Gaza City on Monday, with residents reporting that the IDF bombed four schools that were sheltering displaced people, and at least 10 Palestinians were killed in the area. โ€œExplosions never stopped; they bombed schools and homes. It felt like earthquakes,โ€ Salah, a 60-year-old father of five children from Gaza City, told Reuters. โ€œIn the news we hear a ceasefire is near, on the ground, we see death and we hear explosions.โ€

Unimpeded Mass Murder, Safari Style

June 30, 2025

Badri Raina

Badri Raina

The Wire, 27/Jun/2025

twitter

The genocidaires of the past gave no food packets; they only killed. Trump and Netanyahu do both at once.

Unimpeded Mass Murder, Safari Style

Palestinians inspect the damage at a school used as a shelter by displaced residents that was hit by Israeli military strike and killed at least 36 people, in Gaza City, on Monday, May 26, 2025. Photo: AP/PTI

You just may have noticed that a new ingenious modality of mass murder has been in operation in Gaza.

Call it game-hunting, safari style.

Recall how when some royals used to be taken on a tiger shoot, a bait would be tied to a tree so a big cat could be drawn to it for the dignitaryโ€™s  convenient aim.

So now, dangerously famished Palestinian children, women, old folk on spindly legs are got the better of by being drawn to the bait where ostensibly benevolent patrons are ready to hand out food packets.

As soon as they rush to the bait, the guns blaze. As most are eliminated, some manage to grab a packet or two, proving to the world  how the scheme remains such a success at both ends โ€“ some get to eat, salving the qualms of those upset at being accused of allowing genocide, others swell the ranks of the dead, facilitating the grand project of ethnic cleansing.

When did the world see so clever a two-timing enterprise?

The genocidaires of the past gave no food packets; they only killed. Trump and Netanyahu do both at once. What could be smarter? And how could anyone object, not that anyone is objecting.

You see, the killings in Gaza are game-hunting; in Ukraine it is people who get killed.

Which brings home another sad reality: Curse me if you will, but as a true follower of the Sanatan Dharma, I have been having trouble reconciling Dharma with ethical indifference to the mass murder of a whole innocent population.

Nothing is closer in exclusionary genius to Hindutva than Zionism

I am unable to swallow the trick that my noble nationโ€™s so-noble government played in the United Nations General Assembly.

Where 149 countries voted in favour of demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, and the resumption of humanitarian aid operated by the United Nations, Naya Bharat abstained from voting.

Perhaps we were setting up an example of how to eat the cake and have it too: after all, nothing is closer in exclusionary genius to Hindutva than Zionism, and nobody more consequential for ensuring Viksit Bharat than Trump, Musk, the Pentagon, Silicon Valley etc.

So, at one canny stroke of turning our face away from genocide, we accomplished the feat of not annoying either of our pals, not knowing how badly this Trump fellow would behave subsequently.

But these are risks great governments have to take in the larger national interest. After all, as Vishwa Guru, the worst we can do is to take sides.

Then, did we not also abandon our so-close friends in the SCO by abstaining there as well when the organisation to which India belongs issued a statement condemning Israel for attacking Iran?

Nobody may thus accuse us of inconsistency in our extraordinary  foreign policy towards the comity of nations.

Now that I am arguing the case, I say mea culpa  for  not being able to square these cunning decisions with my Sanatana Dharma.

So, give me time and I will follow the leader whose  finesse in these matters I have thus far been too incapable of absorbing.

In the meanwhile, the Mecca/Medina Islamic world more than matches us in their brand of sagacious cynicism towards the game-hunt in Gaza.

Also Read: If Trump Turns Tyrant, Can Others Be Far Behind?

As to the fussy International Criminal Court, their warrant of arrest against the conqueror of Palestine and the elimination of innocents remains a residual pinprick from a queasy but defeated world that no longer exists.

Why these judges and prosecutors in the Hague should be receiving either the worldโ€™s attention or their salaries from honest tax-payers is a conundrum that may also be up for resolution should Trump and Netanyahu go from strength to strength, should the grand nations of Europe continue to behave with  customary sophistication, and should rising stars like Narendra Modi  show the way to  moral  fusspots whose understanding of great events and great ideas remains atavistic.

So help us god, and so may  the Palestinian lambs-to-the-slaughter know that they serve a noble and mighty purpose in their canonical sacrifice.

Badri Raina taught at Delhi University.

The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

President Trump Told Netanyahu To โ€˜Keep Goingโ€™ in Iran

June 19, 2025

ย Trump said Netanyahu is a ‘good man’ who has been treated ‘unfairly’

by Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.com  | Jun 18, 2025

President Trump said on Wednesday that he told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a phone call a day earlier to โ€œkeep goingโ€ with his attacks on Iran.

The president told reporters that Netanyahu, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for his role in war crimes in Gaza, is a โ€œgood manโ€ who has been treated โ€œvery unfairlyโ€ by his own country. โ€œHeโ€™s a wartime president. Going through this nonsense โ€” ridiculous,โ€ Trump said.

Trumpโ€™s comments about Netanyahu come amid anticipation over whether or not the US will enter Israelโ€™s war with Iran directly by launching airstrikes. The US has supported the assault by providing weapons and intelligence and intercepting Iranian missiles and drones, but so far hasnโ€™t launched direct strikes of its own.

Trump and Netanyahu at the White House on April 7, 2025 (White House photo)

The president also said on Wednesday that โ€œnobody knowsโ€ whether heโ€™ll enter the war or not. When asked if he was moving closer on a decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities, Trump said, โ€œYou donโ€™t know that Iโ€™m going to even do it. You donโ€™t know. I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what Iโ€™m going to do. I can tell you this, that Iranโ€™s got a lot of trouble.โ€

In other comments to the press, Trump said he wasnโ€™t interested in an Israel-Iran ceasefire. โ€œWeโ€™re not looking for a ceasefire. Weโ€™re looking for a total and complete victory. Again, you know what the victory is: no nuclear weapon,โ€ he said.

Netanyahu launched his war of aggression against Iran under the pretext of preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, but US intelligence assessed before the attacks that Tehran was not pursuing a nuclear bomb.

๐ˆ๐ซ๐š๐งโ€™๐ฌ ๐Š๐ก๐š๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ž๐ข ๐‘๐ž๐ฃ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐“๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฉโ€™๐ฌ ๐ƒ๐ž๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐’๐ฎ๐ซ๐ซ๐ž๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ, ๐–๐š๐ซ๐ง๐ฌ ๐”๐’ ๐€๐ ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ ๐„๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐–๐š๐ซ

June 18, 2025

๐‘‡โ„Ž๐‘’ ๐ผ๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘›๐‘–๐‘Ž๐‘› ๐‘™๐‘’๐‘Ž๐‘‘๐‘’๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘‘ ๐‘–๐‘“ ๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘’ ๐‘ˆ๐‘† ๐‘Ž๐‘ก๐‘ก๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘˜๐‘  ๐ผ๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘› ๐‘–๐‘ก ๐‘ค๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘™๐‘‘ ๐‘ ๐‘ข๐‘“๐‘“๐‘’๐‘Ÿ ‘๐‘–๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ÿ๐‘’๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘™๐‘’ โ„Ž๐‘Ž๐‘Ÿ๐‘š’

by Dave DeCamp, Antiwar. com | Jun 18, 2025

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Wednesday rejected President Trumpโ€™s demand for an โ€œunconditional surrenderโ€ and warned the US against entering the war by launching strikes on Iran, saying the US would suffer โ€œirreparable harm.โ€

Trump has also threatened Khamenei, claiming the US was aware of his location but wasnโ€™t going to kill him for the time being. โ€œ[Trump] has threatened us. Not only does he make threats, but he also uses absurd, unacceptable rhetoric to openly demand that the Iranian people surrender to him. When a person hears such things, itโ€™s truly surprising,โ€ Khamenei said in a televised address.

โ€œIt isnโ€™t wise to tell the Iranian nation to surrender. Wise people who know Iran, the Iranian people, and Iranโ€™s history would never utter such words. What should the Iranian nation surrender to? The Iranian nation isnโ€™t a nation that surrenders. We havenโ€™t attacked anyone, and we definitely wonโ€™t tolerate anyone attacking us, and we will never surrender in response to the attacks of anyone,โ€ Khamenei said.

Khamenei during his televised address (photo via his website)

The US has supported Israelโ€™s war on Iran by providing weapons and intelligence and by intercepting Iranian missiles and drones. So far, the US hasnโ€™t launched direct airstrikes on Iran, but Trump is considering doing so, especially against the Fordow nuclear plant, which is buried deep underground.

โ€œOf course, the Americans who are familiar with the policies of this region know that the US entering in this matter [war] is 100% to its own detriment,โ€ Khamenei said. โ€œThe damage it will suffer will be far greater than any harm that Iran may encounter. The harm the US will suffer will definitely be irreparable if they enter this conflict militarily.โ€

Iranian ballistic missiles are believed to be able to do significant damage to US bases in the region. Trump was asked on Wednesday if he would launch strikes on Iranโ€™s nuclear program, but wouldnโ€™t say. โ€œI may do it. I may not do it. Nobody knows what Iโ€™m going to do,โ€ he said.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched the war under the pretext of stopping Iran from advancing toward a nuclear bomb, but US intelligence agencies had assessed there was no evidence Tehran was working to make a nuclear weapon, and the US was unconvinced by new Israeli intelligence.

Israelโ€™s attack also disrupted negotiations between the US and Iran. Trump said on Wednesday that Iran had asked for a meeting at the White House, but the claim was rejected by Tehran, as Iranian officials have said they wonโ€™t negotiate while Israel continues its attacks.

โ€œNo Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House. The only thing more despicable than his lies is his cowardly threat to โ€˜take outโ€™ Iranโ€™s Supreme Leader,โ€ Iranโ€™s mission to the UN said. โ€œIran does NOT negotiate under duress, shall NOT accept peace under duress, and certainly NOT with a has-been warmonger clinging to relevance.โ€

Pure Orwell: Europe condemns Iran for attacks on its own territory

June 16, 2025

Europe Emmanuel Macron Ursula Von der Leyen Iran attacks

In their hypocrisy over Israel, EU elites once again expose the rotting corpse of the so-called ‘rules based order’

Europe

  1. regions europe
  2. israel-iran

Eldar Mamedov, Responsible Statecraft, Jun 14, 2025

When Israeli warplanes struck Iran this week โ€” violating Iranian sovereignty in a brazen act of aggression, killing scores of civilians alongside top military commanders and nuclear scientists and inviting Iranโ€™s equally indiscriminate retaliatory strikes โ€” Europeโ€™s leaders didnโ€™t condemn the attack.

They perversely endorsed it and condemned Iran for the attacks on its own territory.

The president of France Emmanuel Macron set the tone by condemning Iranโ€™s โ€œongoing nuclear programโ€ and reaffirming โ€œIsraelโ€™s right to defend itself and secure its security.โ€ President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen seemed to have spoken from the same script โ€œreiterating Israelโ€™s right to defend itself,โ€ embellished by some generic platitudes about the need for restraint and de-escalation.

The German foreign ministry went a step further and actually โ€œstrongly condemnedโ€ Iran for โ€œan indiscriminate attack on Israeli territoryโ€ โ€” even before Tehran launched its missiles in response for Israelโ€™s attack on its territory โ€” while fully endorsing Israelโ€™s actions.

This Orwellian rhetoric isnโ€™t just incompetence or ignorance. Itโ€™s the culmination of years of European diplomatic malpractice that helped to manufacture this crisis โ€” and exposed the “rules-based order” as a corpse. Europeโ€™s double standards killed its credibility.

Europeโ€™s stance on Ukraine invoked Article 2(4) of the U.N. Charter with political clarity: “All members shall refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity of any state.” Yet when Israel attacked Iran โ€” with no legal basis for self-defense โ€” Europe de-facto reframed aggression as virtue, and condoned it.

Europeโ€™s moral and diplomatic collapse hasnโ€™t gone unnoticed. Two globally respected voices delivered particularly damning verdicts. Mohamed ElBaradei, Nobel Laureate and former head of the U.N.โ€™s atomic energy watchdog, offered a humiliating crash course in international law to the German foreign ministry.

Reacting to Berlinโ€™s endorsement of Israelโ€™s โ€œtargeted strikes against Iranian nuclear facilitiesโ€ (never mind the hundreds of civilians killed in these strikes), El Baradei reminded it that such strikes are prohibited under the Geneva Conventions to which Germany is a party, and that the use of force in international relations โ€œis generally prohibited in the UN Charter with the exception of the right of self-defense in the case of armed attack or upon authorization by the Security Council in the case of collective security action.โ€

For her part, Francesca Albanese, U.N. special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, reacting to Macronโ€™s statement, commented that โ€œon the day Israel, unprovoked, has attacked Iran, the president of a major European power, finally admits that in the Middle East, Israel, and only Israel, has the right to defend itself.โ€

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don’t miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.

Invalid emailEnter your email

The message of the likes of El Baradei and Albanese is unequivocal: when Europe applauds Israelโ€™s strike while condemning Russiaโ€™s invasion, it doesnโ€™t uphold universal rules โ€” it enforces its tribalist identity: โ€œrulesโ€ only apply to adversaries, not friends. This is fatal to Europeโ€™s pretense of moral authority โ€” it has been well noticed in the Global South, but also among many European citizens too.

This pretense looks even more detached from reality given that the crisis in the Middle East erupted on fertile ground prepared by serial European failure. First it was the E3 (Britain, France, Germany) failure to uphold the JCPOA following the U.S. withdrawal under Donald Trumpโ€™s presidency in 2018. While the EU offered rhetorical support for the nuclear deal, it buckled to U.S. sanctions and refused to shield EU firms willing to engage with Iran. It let the JCPOA die, de-facto creating a vacuum for escalation.

Further, while mediators like Oman and Qatar brokered talks on a new nuclear deal between the U.S. and Iran, the EU pushed for an IAEA resolution censoring Iran days before Israelโ€™s strike, torpedoing de-escalation and contributing to creating a more menacing, dangerous security environment, with the U.N. Security Council sanctions snapback and potential Iranโ€™s withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) lurking in the background.

Each of these failures validated Tehranโ€™s view that it is futile to negotiate with Europe. The E3/EU are now seen not just as a weak party unable to fulfil its commitments under the nuclear agreement, but also an actively destructive player undermining Iranโ€™s security and regional stability.

European powersโ€™ staggering descent into diplomatic irrelevance was starkly illustrated by Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchiโ€™s categorical rejection of his British counterpart David Lammyโ€™s pleas to de-escalate. Indeed, it is difficult to imagine why Tehran should heed these calls when they come from parties it sees as actively colluding with the aggressors.

The likely fallout from Europeโ€™s diplomatic self-sabotage is that it incinerated whatever residual trust it still had in Iran and the broader Global South. It all but guaranteed proliferation by giving Iranians โ€” now not just the hardliners โ€” a powerful incentive to seek nuclear weaponization, an outcome that could have been avoided had Europe engaged in serious, good faith talks with Iran on reviving the nuclear deal. Iranโ€™s withdrawal from the NPT is no longer a merely theoretical possibility.

All of these developments dramatically increase the likelihood of blowback against European interests: a regional war in the Middle East means more uncontrolled migration, heightened risks of terrorism on European soil or against European interests in the region, and energy shocks if Iran delivers on its threats to block the Hormuz Straight, the worldโ€™s principal oil trade artery.

Absent an urgent but unlikely course correction, such as holding Israel accountable for its regional aggression, Europeโ€™s decay will accelerate. When Brussels exempts allies from rules imposed on rivals, it doesnโ€™t preserve peace โ€” it signs its own geopolitical suicide note.

Eldar Mamedov

Eldar Mamedov is a Brussels-based foreign policy expert and Non-resident Fellow at the Quincy Institute.

๐’๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐œ๐ž๐ฌ: ๐”๐’ ๐–๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐„๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ซ ๐ˆ๐ฌ๐ซ๐š๐ž๐ฅโ€™๐ฌ ๐–๐š๐ซ ๐–๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ˆ๐ซ๐š๐ง

June 15, 2025


Call the White House and tell them you do not want any part of this disastrous war

by Dave DeCamp, Antiwar.com, Jun 15, 2025

Sources familiar with the matter have told Antiwar.com Editorial Director Scott Horton that the Trump administration is poised to enter Israelโ€™s aggressive war against Iran directly. US airstrikes on Iran could begin as soon as Monday. Please contact the White House by calling (202-456-7041) or sending an email. Tell them that you do not want the US to enter this disastrous war, which could lead to heavy American casualties at US bases across the Middle East. The US has supported the war by reportedly providing Israel with intelligence and helping intercept Iranian missiles and drones, but so far, there have been no direct US attacks on Iran. Iranian officials have warned that Tehran would hit US bases in the region in response to any US strikes. Axios reported on Saturday that Israel is urging the US to join the war since Israel lacks the bunker-busting bombs necessary to do serious damage to Iranโ€™s Fordow plant, which is buried deep underground. An Israeli official told Axios that President Trump had previously suggested the US could strike Fordow. Trump himself said on Sunday that it was โ€œpossibleโ€ that the US would get directly involved in the war, which Israel launched early Friday morning with airstrikes across Iran. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu started the war under the pretext of preventing Iran from building a nuclear weapon. But it was the consensus of the US intelligence community that there was no evidence Iran was working toward a nuclear weapon, and Tehran made clear they were ready to make a deal with the US that would significantly lower uranium enrichment levels and increase oversight of its nuclear program in exchange for US sanctions relief. Ali Larijani, an aide to Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has previously said that the one thing that would make Tehran reconsider its prohibition on the development of nuclear weapons would be a US or Israeli attack. โ€œWe are not moving towards (nuclear) weapons, but if you do something wrong in the Iranian nuclear issue, you will force Iran to move towards that because it has to defend itself,โ€ Larijani said on April 1. โ€œIran does not want to do this, but โ€ฆ (it) will have no choice,โ€ he added. โ€œIf at some point you (the US) move towards bombing by yourself or through Israel, you will force Iran to make a different decision.โ€

Israel and US modified F-35s to enable Iran attack without refuelling, sources say

June 15, 2025

US official says Israel used drop tanks, denying that any mid-air or land refuelling took place

An Israeli Air Force F-35 Lightning II fighter aircraft flies over during an air show in Tel Aviv on April 26, 2023 (JACK GUEZ / AFP)

By Sean Mathews

Published date: 14 June 2025 19:34 BST | Last update:9 hours 49 mins ago

The US and Israel altered Israel’s F-35 warplanes to extend their range without the need for refuelling or compromising on stealth to help Israel’s attack on Iran, Middle East Eye can reveal. 

The modification is secret, but two US officials speaking to MEE on condition of anonymity confirmed that Israel did not use mid-air refuelling during its Friday attack on Iran or land their warplanes for refuelling at any nearby countries. 

Instead, the US officials told MEE that Israel and the US modified the F-35’s system to carry additional fuel that did not impact the F-35โ€™s stealth features. The Israeli designation for their version of the F-35s is called the F-35I Adir.

The F-35 is the only long-range stealth fighter in the world, and its features make it difficult for radar or infrared sensors to track it. 

The scale of Israelโ€™s Friday attack and the surprise nature of it mean the improvement is a sea change for the F-35, the US officials told MEE. 

New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch

Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters

The F-35s performance is going to be carefully studied by Middle Eastern countries looking to acquire them, as well as the USโ€™s foes, China and Russia. 

โ€œThis is a game changer. Israel had our cooperation on this modification,โ€ one US defence official told MEE, speaking on condition of anonymity. 

Both officials confirmed that Israel modified their F-35Is with US involvement. 

Exclusive: US quietly sent hundreds of Hellfire missiles to Israel before Iran attack

Read More ยป

One US official refused to share details on how the F-35 was altered to carry more fuel, but suggested an external feature was added.

The second US official said that Israel attached external drop tanks to the F-35s.

โ€œItโ€™s impressive. Period,โ€ Richard Aboulafia, an aerospace expert at aerodynamic advisory told MEE when asked about the US officials’ statements. 

Aboulafia said that the only option Israel had in place of not refuelling was to use drop tanks. 

โ€œThe big challenge is devising the F-35s interface system with drop tanks that donโ€™t compromise stealth. Not only do you have to design the fixtures, but some sort of in-line modification has to be done. The Israelis, with our cooperation, I assume, practically did surgery on an existing jet to make this modification.โ€ 

The F-35 has a publicly stated combat range of roughly 700 miles. The shortest distance between Israel and Iran is roughly 620 miles one way. 

If mid-air refuelling wasn’t employed, then theoretically they could have used a US base in the Gulf or in Azerbaijan, but the officials MEE spoke to said land refuelling did not take place on any US bases in the region.

Azerbaijan today said it would not allow its airspace or territory to be utilised for launching attacks on Iran or any other country, Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov said in a call with his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araqchi.

Reports have emerged in recent years that Israel was working on such a project. 

In 2021, Israelโ€™s Walla news reported that the Israeli Air Force was working on a drop tank for the F-35I Adirs. The report at the time said Israel could finish the modification in two years. 

Adding a drop tank that carries extra fuel sounds easy, but it is extremely sensitive and difficult, US officials and experts say.

The F-35 contains radar-absorbent materials and its entire engineering is designed to avoid detection. Any change to the body could compromise those features. 

One challenge noted by The Aviationist magazine in 2021 was that once the tank was dropped it could expose other parts of the aircraft to radar because the attachment points and fuel lines would not be covered by any Radar Absorbing Material (RAM). 

The US officials MEE spoke with refused to share details about the F-35s closely guarded engineering. 

Israeli Forces Kill 106 More Palestinians in Gaza, Including Aid Seekers

June 9, 2025

The Health Ministry said at least five Palestinians were killed on Sunday morning while seeking aid

by Dave DeCamp, Antiwar. com, June 8, 2025

Gazaโ€™s Health Ministry said on Sunday that Israeli attacks killed at least 106 Palestinians and wounded 393 as Israeli forces continue to pound the Strip with airstrikes and shoot desperate Palestinians seeking aid.

The Health Ministry said that at least five Palestinians were killed and 123 were injured while seeking aid at distribution points run by the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).

According to The Cradle, at least one Palestinian was killed by Israeli gunfire at a distribution site at the Netzarim Corridor, which separates northern Gaza from the rest of the Strip. Four were reported killed when Israeli tanks, gunboats, and snipers opened fire near a site in the southern city of Rafah. Other reports said the death toll in Rafah rose to 13.

Mourners react during the funeral of a Palestinian killed, in what the Gaza health ministry says was Israeli fire near a distribution center in Rafah, at Nasser hospital in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip, June 8, 2025. REUTERS/Hatem Khaled

According to Reuters, the Israeli military acknowledged that it opened fire on Palestinians near the site in Rafah, claiming its forces โ€œhad directed warning shots at a group that was moving towards soldiers and deemed a threat to them.โ€

The Health Ministry said that the total number of Palestinians killed en route to aid sites since the GHF began operating has reached 115, and another 1,100 have been injured.

Heavy Israeli airstrikes and shelling were also reported across Gaza. According to the Palestinian news agency WAFA, at least 31 Palestinians were killed by Israeli strikes, mainly in the southern cities of Rafah and Khan Younis, and in Gaza City and Jabalia in the north.

Also on Sunday, the Israeli military claimed that it had found and identified the body of Hamas leader Mohammed Sinwar, who it alleges was killed in a May 13 bombing outside the European Hospital in Khan Younis. Israel alleged that tunnels were underneath the facility, which Hamas has previously denied. Sinwar took over as Hamasโ€™s leader following the killing of his brother, Yahya Sinwar, in October 2024.

Gazaโ€™s Health Ministry said that since Israel resumed its genocidal war on March 18, at least 4,603 Palestinians have been killed, and 14,186  were injured. The numbers account for dead and wounded Palestinians brought to hospitals and morgues.

Since October 7, 2023, the ministryโ€™s death toll has reached 54,880, and the number of wounded has climbed to 126,227, figures that donโ€™t account for thousands missing and presumed dead under the rubble or indirect deaths caused by the Israeli siege.

Israeli forces have killed or wounded over 600 people at aid centers over the past week

June 5, 2025

Andre Damon, wsws.org, 5 June 2025

@Andre__Damon

Palestinians carry Reem Al-Akhras, who was killed while heading to an aid distribution hub, during her funeral in Khan Younis, Gaza Strip, Tuesday, June 3, 2025 [AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana]

In the week since Israel launched food distributions under the auspices of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), Israeli forces have turned the aid distributions into killing fields almost every day.

In a statement published Tuesday, the Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor reported that over the past week, over 600 Palestinians have been killed or injured in Israeli attacks on crowds at the food distribution points.

Prior to the launch of the US-Israeli โ€œaidโ€ operation, humanitarian and human rights groups, including the UN, warned that the scheme was merely a means to lure Gazaโ€™s remaining population to the south, where they could be trapped in concentration camps in preparation for the US-Israeli plan to ethnically cleanse Gaza by expelling its population.

It has since emerged that the purpose of the โ€œaidโ€ centers is even more sinister: they are launching points not only for indiscriminate massacres of aid-seekers, but for what appear to be targeted assassinations of members of the crowd. Rather than being a humanitarian lifeline, they are killing fields.

On Tuesday, Israeli forces carried out yet another massacre near an aid distribution site in Rafah, killing 27 people and injuring 90. On Monday, 3 people were killed and dozens were wounded in nearly the exact same circumstances. This followed a massacre on Sunday in which 30 people were killed and 170 were wounded.

In its report, the Euro-Med Monitor stated that, โ€œAccording to testimonies and information collected by Euro-Med Monitorโ€™s field researchers, Israeli army snipers deliberately targeted starving civilians with direct gunfire, mostly to the head, despite no apparent threat to Israeli forces.โ€

One survivor told the monitor, โ€œAt around 3:50 a.m. today, an Israeli quadcopter flew over and photographed the civilian crowd. Then, the army opened fire from a crane in the area. I personally carried three people who had been shot in the head. Most of the injuries were to the head. People came looking for food to ease their hunger, but they went back dead or wounded.โ€

In another testimony, A. B., 38, told the Euro-Med Monitor team, โ€œAround 5:45 a.m., we managed to enter the center, and I was able to get an aid package. On my way out, I met a woman in her 40s who said she couldnโ€™t continue forward and that she and her children were suffering from hunger and poverty. I gave her my package and returned to try to get another one, but there was nothing left. A quadcopter was overhead, broadcasting insulting remarks: โ€˜You animals, go away, the supply is out.โ€™โ€

He continued, โ€œAs I was leaving and nearing the chuteโ€™s exit, I saw a child crying out loudly, โ€˜Mom, get up, Mom, get up.โ€™ I went closer and found the woman I had given my package to lying in a pool of blood. She was dead,โ€ he said. โ€œA group of young men and I carried her outside and placed her in an ambulance. I accompanied her son to the hospital. On the way, along the sea road, I saw seven bodies lying on the side of the road.โ€

Aid-seekers attempting to access food are forced to wait in long lines before being subjected to facial recognition scans. The testimony presented by the Euro-Med Monitor could indicate that the ongoing massacres are not random killing sprees, but that the facial recognition scans are being used for targeted assassinations at the aid distribution sites.

On Wednesday, the United States vetoed a UN Security Council resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza โ€“ the fifth time it has done so. Fourteen other members of the Security Council voted for the ceasefire, which called the humanitarian situation in Gaza โ€œcatastrophicโ€ and called for the lifting of restrictions on food aid.

โ€œIsrael has a right to defend itself, which includes defeating Hamas and ensuring they are never again in a position to threaten Israel,โ€ said U.S. Ambassador Dorothy Sheato. โ€œIn this regard, any product that undermines our close ally Israelโ€™s security is a non-starter.โ€

Sheato openly endorsed the so-called โ€œGaza Humanitarian Foundation,โ€ declaring, โ€œWe instead urge the UN and NGOs to support the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to help it safely deliver aid without being diverted by Hamas.โ€ In an open embrace of the massacres as the GHF aid centers, she said the foundation is delivering aid โ€œconsistent with the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence.โ€

The UN vetoed a similarly worded UN Security Council resolution under the Biden administration, using essentially the same rationalization.

Riyad Monsour, Palestineโ€™s representative to the UN, told the Security Council, โ€œthe engineered starvation that has brought an entire civilian population, 2 million people, among them 1 million children, to the edge of famine and then used aid to lure them and confine them to an extremely limited area of the Gaza Strip, clearly to facilitate their expulsion and annexation.โ€

Last week, Jens Laerke, a spokesperson for the UNโ€™s humanitarian office, told reporters in a briefing that โ€œOne hundred percent of the population is at risk of famine,โ€ and that Gaza is the โ€œhungriest place on earth.โ€

He added that Israelโ€™s ongoing blockade of humanitarian aid into Gaza has made the UNโ€™s efforts to feed the population โ€œone of the most obstructed aid operations, not only in the world today but in recent history.โ€

On Wednesday, UNICEF spokesperson James Elder said in a statement that he is โ€œshockedโ€ by the extent of malnutrition in Gaza, saying, โ€œIโ€™m seeing teenage boys in tears, showing me their ribs.โ€

He condemned Israelโ€™s daily massacres of aid-seekers, saying, โ€œImagine knowing thereโ€™d be a massacre, but being so desperate to feed your family that you still go.โ€

Gazaโ€™s health ministry said Wednesday that 95 Palestinians had been killed in the last 24-hour period and that 440 had been injured. Its official Gaza death toll has risen to 54,607 killed with 125,341 injured since October 7, 2023.