Express India, May 25, 2010 at 0954 hrs IST
New York:
Top US Commander in Middle East, Gen. David H Petraeus, has signed a secret directive ordering that ‘Special Operations’ troops be sent to countries such as Iran for reconnaissance, a move that may lead to possible strikes against Tehran if tensions over its nuclear ambitions escalate. These military officials would be dispatched to nations in the Middle East, Central Asia and the Horn of Africa as well as Iran on intelligence gathering assignments, ‘The New York Times’ reported.
Citing unnamed officials, it said the order permitting reconnaissance could pave the way for possible military strikes in Iran if tensions over its nuclear ambitions escalate.
The document appeared to authorise specific operations in Iran, most likely to gather intelligence about the country’s nuclear programme or identify dissident groups that might be useful for a future military offensive, according to the daily.
“The Obama administration insists that for the moment, it is committed to penalising Iran for its nuclear activities only with diplomatic and economic sanctions,” the newspaper said.
“Nevertheless, the Pentagon has to draw up detailed war plans to be prepared in advance, in the event that President (Barack) Obama ever authorises a strike.”
The Defence Department “can’t be caught flat-footed,” said one Pentagon official.
The daily noted that while the previous Bush administration had approved some clandestine military activities, the present directive intended to make such efforts more systematic and long term.
Its goals are to build networks that could “penetrate, disrupt, defeat or destroy” al-Qaeda and other militant groups, as well as to “prepare the environment” for future attacks by American or local military forces, the document, which was viewed by the paper, said.
“The order, however, does not appear to authorise offensive strikes in any specific countries,” it said.
The daily reported that one of the reasons for broadening the secret activities was because the US military wanted to break its dependence on the CIA and other spy agencies.
Some officials, however, noted that the authorised activities could strain relationships with friendly governments like Saudi Arabia or Yemen, or incite the anger of hostile nations like Iran and Syria.
The directive, the Joint Unconventional Warfare Task Force Execute Order, was signed on September 30 last year, and reportedly may have been the cause for surge of US military activity in Yemen that began three months later.



Ya’alon also said that there was “no doubt, looking at the overall situation, that we are already in a military confrontation with Iran.” Israel has accused Iran of arming most of its enemies in neighboring countries.
The latest comments came in response to Undersecretary Flournoy’s


Did Ahmedinejad say anything wrong about nuclear weapons?
May 6, 2010By Badri Raina, ZNet, May 6, 2010
Change Text Size a- | A+
Badri Raina’s ZSpace Page
Sauce for the Goose is not
Sauce for the Gander.
Unlike my friend, J. Sriraman, the reputed columnist, I am no expert on matters nuclear.
As a lay student of contemporary international history (where “contemporary” goes back , for purposes of this note, to the second world war), I agree with some six billion others that nuclear weapons are unacceptably evil in a usually acceptably evil world.
Everybody of course says so, including those who remain in control of the largest stockpiles.
Yet what stares you in the face is the unconscionable gap between the ethics of the issue which hardly anyone denies, and the record of performance through the decades.
And strikingly here, those that bear the most onus, even opprobrium, seem the most self-righteous.
Which is, after all, what the reviled President of Iran, Ahmedinejad, underscored in his recent appearance at a nuclear disarmament conclave in America.
Continues >>
Share this:
Tags:Badri Raina, Iran, President Ahmedinejad, United Staes and nuclear weapons
Posted in Commentary, imperialism, Iran, Uncategorized, US policy, USA | Leave a Comment »