Archive for January, 2010

Egyptian ‘President’ Mubarak rejects even ‘debate’ on Gaza barrier

January 24, 2010

Middle East Online, Jan 24, 2010



Under heavy public criticism inside and outside Egypt


HRW calls on Egypt to revoke its ‘draconian emergency law’, slams ‘thuggery’ police state.

CAIRO – Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak on Sunday defended the construction of an underground barrier on the border with the Gaza Strip as a matter of national security and sovereignty.

“The works and reinforcements on our eastern border are a matter of Egyptian sovereignty. We do not accept a debate on the issue with anyone,” Mubarak said in a speech to mark Police Day.

Continues >>

An open letter to Sir John Chilcot

January 24, 2010

Various undersigned

Uruknet.infoJanuary 23, 2010

Sir

You stated the Iraq Inquiry would not apportion blame, but if it produces evidence that this country’s invasion and occupation of Iraq was illegal, then the public deserves that the matter not be allowed to rest there. As it is, the Inquiry’s Legal Advisor Sarah Goom has confirmed that if the Inquiry receives any ‘new evidence that criminal offences have been committed’, it would be obliged to refer that evidence to the appropriate investigating authority.

You also said the Inquiry is not ‘here to provide public sport or entertainment.’ Justified public outrage is neither, and must be fully and appropriately addressed. You added, ‘We ask fair questions and we expect full and truthful answers.’ Given Tony Blair’s past public assertions on Iraq, the public expects great depth and persistence when you examine him, with particular and detailed attention being addressed to all relevant issues of international law.

Continues >>

Los Angeles Jews For Peace Rally

January 24, 2010

LA Jews for Peace and friends make their voices heard in front of the Federal building on the 1 year anniversary of Israel’s Operation “Castlead ”

The Power Of Propaganda

Why Did We Focus on Securing Haiti Rather Than Helping Haitians?

January 23, 2010

Here are two possibilities, neither of them flattering.

By Ben Ehrenreich, Slate, Jan. 21, 2010

US. Troops in Haiti. Click image to expand.

U.S. troops in Haiti

By the weekend, it was clear that something perverse was going on in Haiti, something savage and bestial in its lack of concern for human life. I’m not talking about the earthquake, and certainly not about the so-called “looting,” which I prefer to think of as the autonomously organized distribution of unjustly hoarded goods. I’m talking about the U.S. relief effort.

Continues >>

Guantanamo: Still open for business

January 23, 2010
Morning Star Online,  January 22,  2010
by Paddy McGuffin
Almost 200 prisoners remain in the former naval base on Cuba

Almost 200 prisoners remain in the former naval base on Cuba

Friday saw Barack Obama’s self-imposed deadline for the closure of the Guantanamo Bay concentration camp lapse.

The US administration pledged to shut the prison by January 22 at the latest but on Friday night almost 200 prisoners remained in the former naval base in the Caribbean amid new allegations of murder, torture and state cover-ups.

Continues >>

Cuba Stands By The Haitian People

January 22, 2010

Friday, 22 January 2010, 4:40 pm
Press Release: Embajada de Cuba Nueva Zelanda

Scoop Independent News

The solidarity of the Cuban People with Haiti did not arrive because of the earthquake. This special collaboration has been offered to our sister nation for more than one decade.

This is not a conjunctural conduct, instead it is a Cuban tradition which has been existing since the beginning of the Cuban Revolution.

Cuban Doctors have been helping to different countries in different kind of natural disasters for the last 50 years. We have been supporting in different tragedies, since the earthquake of Argelia in 1963 and to Pakistan and Indonesia.

Currently Cuba has 40.000 Doctors, Nurses and Technical Health staff Around 70 countries, including Medical brigades in Kiribati, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu and Tuvalu.

Continues >>

U.S. policy in Gaza remains unchanged

January 22, 2010

by Charles Fromm and Ellen Massey, Inter Press Service News

WASHINGTON, Jan 22, 2010 (IPS) – One year ago Thursday, the last Israeli tanks were lumbering out of the Gaza Strip, ending the 22-day Gaza War and leaving in their wake a decimated landscape and population.

A year later, the humanitarian and security situation in the devastated coastal enclave remains dire, yet the Barack Obama administration continues to overlook the crisis in Gaza, an approach which some experts say is an extension of the previous administration’s policy.

This policy has also done little to alleviate what human rights groups warn is a growing humanitarian crisis, plunging the Gaza Strip further into poverty and insecurity.

Continues >>

The Arrogance of Empire, Detailed

January 22, 2010

By Ron Jacobs, ZNet, January 21, 2010
Ron Jacobs’s ZSpace Page

In the first week of 2010, five US soldiers were killed in Afghanistan. The last week of 2009 saw the deaths of eight CIA agents there. Several more Afghan civilians were killed during this period, including the apparent executions of several young boys by persons either in the US military or working with them. In addition, insurgent forces targeted a Karzai government in official in eastern Khost and launched rockets at the site of a future US consulate in Herat. It was reported on January 6, 2010 that the Obama administration was sending 1,000 more US civilian experts to the country to help in so-called reconstruction projects. This news was greeted with skepticism from Afghans both in and out of the government. The Afghan ambassador to the United Nations noted that few Afghans trusted these so-called reconstruction endeavors and that the US might do better if they hired Afghans to do the rebuilding instead of shipping in US citizens to “create parallel structures that would ruin (the Afghan government’s) efforts.” The ambassador must be quite aware that the history of US reconstruction in either Afghanistan or Iraqis is a legacy of corruption, poor construction, and failed endeavors that benefited no one but the foreign companies that garnered the contracts.

Continues >>

Close Guantanamo, End Torture

January 22, 2010

by mcjoan, Daily Kos, Jan 21, 2010

It’s been one year since Obama signed his executive orders outlawing torture and to close the prison at Guantanamo. Former Rep. Tom Andrews writes about how this day is being marked in D.C.

A team of twenty combat veterans from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are converging on the US Capitol today to meet with Members of Congress. They are representing two thousand of their fellow veterans who signed a letter to Members of Congress asking that they stop the politics of fear mongering and support our troops in harm’s way by closing the military prison on Guantanamo Bay:

Every day that the facility at Guantanamo Bay remains open and detainees are held without trial is another day that terror networks have an effective recruiting poster. Closing the prison at Guantanamo Bay is in the national security interest of America and the troops that we put into harm’s way. We urge you to do so without delay.

Ironically, the US Senate’s soon-to-be newest member from Massachusetts, Scott Brown, arrives on Capitol Hill today as well. Brown was elected the day before yesterday to the seat held by the late Senator Ted Kennedy.

Brown is bringing a distinctly different message on the subject. He argues that water boarding is not torture and that Gitmo should remain open for business.

The debate over whether the United States should routinely inflict on detainees the very same torture techniques that we hung Japanese officials for inflicting on US soldiers in WWII is far from over….

Today is a day for us all to be off Senator McConnell and Senator-elect Brown’s message. Support the troops being sent into harm’s way. Help two thousand combat veterans deliver their message to Congress: Close Gitmo NOW.

At the New York Times, one of today’s citizen/veteran-lobbyists, Matthew Alexander, assesses where we are, one year after.

Americans can now boast that they no longer “torture” detainees, but they cannot say that detainees are not abused, or even that their treatment meets the minimum standards of humane treatment mandated by the Geneva Conventions, the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (the so-called McCain amendment), United States and international law, or even Mr. Obama’s executive order.

If I were to return to one of the war zones today — as an Air Force officer, I was sent to Iraq to head an interrogation team in 2006 — I would still be allowed to abuse prisoners. This is true even though in my experience, torture or even harsh but legal treatment never got us useful information. Instead, such tactics invariably did just the opposite, convincing detainees to clam up.

The adoption last year of the Army Field Manual as the standard for interrogations across the government, including the C.I.A., was a considerable improvement. But we missed a unique opportunity for progress last August when the president’s task force on interrogations recommended no changes to the manual, which was hastily revised in 2006 in the aftermath of the Abu Ghraib torture scandal….

The greatest shame of the last year, perhaps, is that the argument over interrogations has shifted from debating what is legal to considering what is just “better than before.” The best way to change things is to update the field manual again to bring our treatment of detainees up to the minimum standard of humane treatment.

The next version of the manual should prohibit solitary confinement for more than, say, two weeks, all stress positions and forms of environmental manipulation, imprisonment in tight spaces and sleep deprivation. Unless we rewrite the book, we will only continue to give Al Qaeda a recruiting tool, to earn the contempt of our allies and to debase our most cherished ideals.

The horrendous story emerging this week about the murder of three Guantanamo detainees in 2006 and the subsequent Justice Department cover-up and stonewalling–which continues in the Obama administration–only adds impetus to this effort. Unanswered torture by Americans will only fuel the flame of hatred against us, as does the constant reminder of a still-open Guanatanamo.

The stain of torture and of Guantanamo becomes more indelible by the day, and it is now no longer just Bush’s and Cheney’s. It is Obama’s and Holder’s, too. And ours. Pretending otherwise won’t make it go away. It will just set it more firmly.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates Confirms Blackwater in Pakistan

January 22, 2010

by Jeremy Scahill, Rebel Reports, Jan 21, 2010


In an interview with the Pakistani TV station Express TV, Defense Secretary Robert Gates confirmed that the private security firms Blackwater and DynCorp are operating inside Pakistan. “They’re operating as individual companies here in Pakistan,” Gates said, according to a DoD transcript of the interview. “There are rules concerning the contracting companies.  If they’re contracting with us or with the State Department here in Pakistan, then there are very clear rules set forth by the State Department and by ourselves.”

This appears to be a contradiction of previous statements made by the Defense Department, by Blackwater, by the Pakistani government and by the US embassy in Islamabad, all of whom claimed Blackwater was not in the country. In September, the US Ambassador to Pakistan, Anne Patterson, denied Blackwater’s presence in the country, stating bluntly, “Blackwater is not operating in Pakistan.” In December in The Nation magazine, I reported on Blackwater’s work for JSOC in Pakistan and on a subcontract with a private Pakistani security company. The Pentagon did not issue any clear public denials, and instead tried to pass the buck to the State Department, which in turn passed it to the US embassy, which in turn issued an unsigned statement saying the story was false.

Pakistan’s Interior Minister Rehman Malik has said on numerous occasions that he would resign if it is proven that Blackwater is operating inside Pakistan.

Asked what the US response would be if the Pakistani parliament passed a law banning private security companies, Gates said, “If it’s Pakistani law, we will absolutely comply.”

Asked about Seymour Hersh’s recent report in The New Yorker that US special forces were inside Pakistan helping to secure the country’s nuclear weapons, Gates said, “Well, you know, we sometimes have journalistic reports in the United States that aren’t terribly accurate either.  You can’t respond to all of them.  I think that one was not true.”