Posts Tagged ‘Pervez Musharraf’

Pakistan police book former President Musharraf: officials

August 12, 2009

By Agence France-Presse

Raw Story, August 11, 2009

ISLAMABAD — Pakistan Tuesday registered a criminal case against Pervez Musharraf, a precursor to potentially putting the ex-president on trial over his 2007 detention of judges as he attempted to cling to power.

Musharraf  imposed a state of emergency and sacked about 60 judges on November 3, 2007 when the supreme court appeared poised to declare him ineligible to contest a presidential election while in military uniform.

On a plea filed by lawyer Mohammad Aslam Ghuman, Islamabad district and sessions judge Mohammad Akmal directed police to register a case against Musharraf, who is currently in Europe.

Continued >>

Pakistan court orders Musharraf to explain emergency rule

July 23, 2009
Reuters

Pakistan court orders Musharraf to explain emergency rule Reuters – Pakistan’s former President Pervez Musharraf smiles during a business meeting in New Delhi March …

Yahoo News, Wed Jul 22, 9:17 am ET

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) – Pakistan’s Supreme Court ordered former president Pervez Musharraf on Wednesday to answer questions next week about his decisions to oust the judiciary and impose emergency rule in 2007.

The order, issued by a 14-member bench headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry, instructs Musharraf to either show up in court himself on July 29 or have an attorney do so on his behalf.

Compliance is not mandatory, but failure to show up will mean Musharraf will have no further chances to defend himself in a case that is aimed at determining whether it was constitutional for him to oust the judiciary and impose emergency rule in November 2007.

The government’s top lawyer said this would be Musharraf’s only opportunity to defend himself.

“We’ve made it clear to the bench that we aren’t prepared to defend him. The government doesn’t consider his actions lawful or constitutional,” Attorney-General Latif Khosa told Reuters after the hearing.

Asked whether criminal proceedings could be started against Musharraf if his actions were declared unconstitutional, Khosa said that would be up to parliament.

“A committee has already been formed to annul his amendments and if it gives the go-ahead, that could happen,” he said.

Musharraf’s moves in late 2007, which included ousting Chaudhry and other judges, triggered nationwide protests and were seen by political opponents as a bid to extend his presidency for another five years.

However, the unpopularity of emergency rule, together with the assassination of rival politician Benazir Bhutto, weakened support for Musharraf, leading to a victory for the opposition Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) in elections in February 2008.

Musharraf resigned last August in the face of an impending impeachment motion, and he left Pakistan over a month ago for London.

Why Pakistan cares about Chief Justice Chaudhry

March 16, 2009
Al Jazeera, March 16, 2009

The campaign to reinstate the sacked chief justice became a popular cause [EPA]

Why is Pakistan’s deposed chief justice causing such a political storm?

Iftikhar Chaudhry became a supreme court judge in 2000 and was appointed as the youngest ever chief justice in June 2005.

He was sacked from the position by Pervez Musharraf, who led Pakistan from 1999 to 2008, and the campaign for his reinstatement, which has seen multiple street protests, became a popular cause in Pakistan.

When Ali Asif Zardari, who took over as leader of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) on the death of his wife, Benazir Bhutto, became president, he formed a coalition on the basis that he would reinstate Chaudhry.

Zardari enticed Nawaz Sharif, the leader of the leader of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), to join him by promising to reinstate Chaudhry but Sharif soon declared it was apparent Zardari was going back this agreement and pulled out of the government.

Why is Chaudhry such a controversial figure?

As chief justice, Chaudhry used his position to reopen a number of cases, including one into the disappearance of people picked up by security agencies on suspicion of being involved in “terrorism”.

He ordered the security agencies to produce people, thought to be “missing”, in court.

He upset a number of prominent people, including Shaukat Aziz, prime minister under Musharraf, by taking up a case looking into the privatisation of a steel firm and cancelling the sale.

Chaudhry was also widely expected to try and insist Musharraf stand down as army chief – a constitutional requirement – in order to seek another term as president.

What happened next?

Musharraf’s administration pressured Chaudhry to quit, but he refused to go, and on March 9, 2007, Musharraf suspended Chaudhry, accusing him of abusing his position.

As chief justice, Chaudhry upset a number
of prominent government officials [AFP]

A panel of judges was established to look into the accusations against Chaudhry, who appointed Aitzaz Ahsan, a parliamentarian and former minister from the PPP, to lead his defence team.Protesting lawyers, led by Ahsan, held rallies to demand the independence of the judiciary and both the PPP and the PML-N got behind the cause.

In July 2007, the judges delivered the first ever finding against a military ruler by lifting Musharraf’s suspension of Chaudhry.

Musharraf engineered his re-election anyway by a subservient parliament in October without stepping down as army chief and while the supreme court allowed the vote to go ahead, it deliberated over whether the result should stand.

Musharraf declared emergency rule, sacked the judges and only reinstated those who took a fresh oath of office, which Chaudhry refused to do.

Having secured the presidency, Musharraf stepped down as army chief.

Chaudhry declared Musharraf’s actions unconstitutional.

With Musharraf gone, why was Chaudhry not reinstated?

The PPP came to power off the back of the assassination of Benazir Bhutto and the popular sentiment over the judges.

But after it won elections, despite reinstating most of the judges sacked by Musharraf, Chaudhry remained deposed.

Analysts say Zardari worries that Chaudhry could rule Musharraf an illegal president and overturn an amnesty given to Zardari and Bhutto in 2007 that allowed them to return to Pakistan without fear of prosecution on corruption charges, which they said were politically motivated.

They say that Zardari is resisting reinstating the judges for fear they might revoke his protection from corruption charges.

“The return of Benazir Bhutto and Zardari to Pakistan took place under a deal with Mushrraf in 2007. As part of the deal all the corruption charges, through a special presidential ordinance called NRO [National Reconciliation Ordinance], were removed, against Zardari especially,” Ishtiaq Ahmad, a professor of international relations at Islamabad’s Qaid-e-Azam University,  told Al Jazeera.

“The NRO remains, but the fear of the Zardari-led regime is, if they restore chief justice Chaudhry – given his assertive background – the NRO might be revoked and then obviously all those charges will come back to haunt Zardari and other party leaders.”

Following intense opposition protest, the government climbed down and on March 16, 2009, announced that Chaudhry would be reinstated.

The date given for his reinstatement is March 21.