The Rise of Democratic Movements in Latin America

August 22, 2007

Alternet

What the Rise of Democratic Movements in Latin America Means for the Rest of the World

By Nadia Martinez, YES! Magazine. Posted August 20, 2007.

As the people of Latin America build democracies from the bottom up, the symbols of power are changing. What used to be emblems of poverty and oppression — indigenous clothing and speech, the labels “campesino” and “landless worker” — are increasingly the symbols of new power. As people-powered movements drive the region toward social justice and equality, these symbols speak, not of elite authority limited to a few, but of power broadly shared.

The symbolism was especially rich last year in Cochabamba, Bolivia, when the new minister of justice made her entrance at an international activists’ summit. Casimira Rodríguez, a former domestic worker, wore the thick, black braids and pollera, a long, multilayered skirt, of an Aymara indigenous woman. As she made her way through the throng, Rodríguez further distinguished herself from a typical law-enforcement chief by passing out handfuls of coca leaves.

Throughout the region, marginalized people are rising up, challenging the system that has kept them poor, and pursuing a new course. In country after country, people are selecting leaders who strongly reject the Washington-led “neoliberal” policies of restricted government spending on social programs, privatization of public services such as education and water, and opening up borders to foreign corporations.

Continued . . .

U.S. envoy says Iraq making poor political progress

August 21, 2007

Reuters, Aug 21, 2007

Photo

 

 

 

 

By Paul Tait

BAGHDAD (Reuters) – Iraq has made “extremely disappointing” progress toward reconciling its warring sects, the U.S. ambassador said on Tuesday, just three weeks before he is due to present a pivotal report on Iraq to the U.S. Congress.

In some of the bluntest language used by a U.S. official toward Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki’s fractured coalition government, ambassador Ryan Crocker also warned that U.S. support for Maliki’s administration was not open-ended.

“Progress on national level issues has been extremely disappointing and frustrating to all concerned, to us, to Iraqis, to the Iraqi leadership itself,” Crocker said.

More . . .

Why are the Democrats giving cover to Bush?

August 21, 2007

Socialist Worker online

August 17, 2007 | Editorial

GEORGE W. Bush’s strategy in Iraq is to keep the U.S. occupation going indefinitely–these days, we’re told, to prevent Iraq from becoming a base for al-Qaeda in the “war on terror.”

So it’s little wonder that so many people have looked to the field of Democratic presidential candidates to provide a plan to bring the troops home. But these Democrats are promoting plans that would keep the U.S. military on the ground in Iraq for the foreseeable future.

“Even as they call for an end to the war and pledge to bring the troops home, the Democratic presidential candidates are setting out positions that could leave the United States engaged in Iraq for years,” the New York Times observed.

Continued . . .

Cheney, Lieberman and the Iran War Conspiracy

August 21, 2007

Huffington Post. Posted August 18, 2007

Neocons beat the drums for another war

By Gareth Porter.

I was never one of those who believed the Bush administration was getting ready to attack Iran in 2006 or early 2007. But it is now clear that at least Vice President Dick Cheney is conspiring to push through a specific plan for war with Iran. And Senator Joe Lieberman is an active part of that conspiracy.

We have known for a long time that Cheney wants a major air attack on Iranian nuclear sites and other military and economic targets. But an August 9 story published by McClatchy newspapers reveals that, instead of waiting for a decision to go ahead with such a strategic attack against Iran, Cheney now hopes to get Bush to approve an attack on camps in Iran where Iraqi Shiite militiamen have allegedly been trained in recent years.

Continued . . .

U.S. foreign policy experts oppose Bush’s surge

August 21, 2007

Reuters

Mon Aug 20, 2007

 

 

 

 

By David Morgan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – More than half of top U.S. foreign policy experts oppose President George W. Bush’s troop increase as a strategy for stabilizing Baghdad, saying the plan has harmed U.S. national security, according to a new survey.

As Congress and the White House await the September release of a key progress report on Iraq, 53 percent of the experts polled by Foreign Policy magazine and the Center for American Progress said they now oppose Bush’s troop build-up.

That is a 22 percentage point jump since the strategy was announced early this year.

The survey of 108 experts, including Republicans and Democrats, showed opposition to the so-called “surge” across the political spectrum, with about two-thirds of conservatives saying it has been ineffective or made things worse in Iraq.

Foreign Policy, published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the experts polled on May 23 to June 26 included former government officials in senior positions including secretary of state, White House national security adviser and top military commanders.

The findings were published in the form of a Terrorism Index in the magazine’s September/October issue, to be released on Monday. The magazine published similar indices in July 2006 and in February.

Bush has deployed 30,000 additional U.S. forces in and around Baghdad to quell sectarian violence in a bid to foster political reconciliation between Iraqi’s Sunni, Shi’ite and Kurdish communities.

Continued . . .

The War as We Saw It

August 20, 2007

By: NYT on: 20.08.2007

Article image

 

(8972 bytes) [c] Print

By BUDDHIKA JAYAMAHA, WESLEY D. SMITH, JEREMY ROEBUCK, OMAR MORA, EDWARD SANDMEIER, YANCE T. GRAY and JEREMY A. MURPHY

Published: August 19, 2007
Baghdad

Paul Hoppe

VIEWED from Iraq at the tail end of a 15-month deployment, the political debate in Washington is indeed surreal. Counterinsurgency is, by definition, a competition between insurgents and counterinsurgents for the control and support of a population. To believe that Americans, with an occupying force that long ago outlived its reluctant welcome, can win over a recalcitrant local population and win this counterinsurgency is far-fetched. As responsible infantrymen and noncommissioned officers with the 82nd Airborne Division soon heading back home, we are skeptical of recent press coverage portraying the conflict as increasingly manageable and feel it has neglected the mounting civil, political and social unrest we see every day. (Obviously, these are our personal views and should not be seen as official within our chain of command.)

Continue . . .

The Unacceptable Excesses of Irreligion

August 20, 2007

ZNet,

Citizen India, Stand Up

By Badri Raina, August 15, 2007

 

Baske dushwaar hai har kaam ka aasan hona,
Aadmi ko bhi mayassar nahi insaan hona.

—Mirza Ghalib

How hard, how impossible
To do the things one can;
Ah that the mighty earthling
Is hardly ever a man.

(trans., in Raina’s Ghalib, Writer’s Workshop, Calcutta, 1984).

It is once again time to speak straight to the point.

An act of the most grossly irreligious cowardice was on display at the Press Club in Hyderabad the other day.

Three elected members of the Andhra Pradesh Assembly belonging to the MIM (Majlis-e-Ittahadul Muslimeen) party barged into the Club where Taslima Nasreen, the self-exiled Bangladeshi writer, now living in India on six-monthly renewable visas, was to release Telegu editions of her works.

On cue, these MLAs, led by Akbaruddin Owaisi, proceeded to pelt the guest author with books, flower pots and other sundry missiles. Television footage of the barbarity clearly showed Ms.Nasreen being hit several times on the head. But for some brave protection furnished by elderly hosts, real physical injury might have been caused to Ms Nasreen who has been critical of Islamic orthodoxy on several counts, especially concerning Muslim women. As the world knows, umpteen fatwas are out requiring her to be beheaded.

Read the full article . . .

The British are retreating from Basra, says al-Sadr

August 20, 2007

The Independent, August 20, 2007

By Nizar Latif in Kufa, Iraq and Phil Sands in Damascus

 

 

The British Army has been defeated in Iraq and left with no option but to retreat from the country, claims radical Shia cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. Violent resistance and a rising death toll among UK troops has forced a withdrawal, he said in an interview with The Independent.

“The British have given-up and they know they will be leaving Iraq soon,” Mr Sadr said. “They are retreating because of the resistance they have faced. Without that, they would have stayed for much longer, there is no doubt.”

The young nationalist cleric heads Iraq’s largest Arab grassroots political movement, and its powerful military wing, the Mehdi army. It has clashed frequently with British forces in southern Iraq, most recently in the battle for power over the oil-rich port city of Basra. Scores of British soldiers have been killed and wounded by Sadrist militants.

More . . .

Iraqi prisoners kept in wire cages

August 20, 2007

news.com.au, August 19, 2007

 

By Waleed Ibrahim And Peter Graff in Baghdad

Article from: Reuters

 

Send this article: Print Email

IRAQ’S Sunni Arab vice president promised better treatment for detainees today and released pictures from inside a Baghdad prison camp that showed hundreds of inmates packed into tented wire-mesh cages.

The rare video pictures from inside an Iraqi prison were released by the office of Sunni Arab vice president Tareq al-Hashemi, who visited the Rusafa prison compound in eastern Baghdad with his Shiite counterpart.

The footage showed row upon row of outdoor tents made of wire mesh and covered with white plastic sheeting, each about the size of a basketball court and housing dozens of inmates.

Prisoners, some stripped to their waists, pressed up against the mesh walls and shouted their innocence.

Some chanted Saddam-era Iraqi nationalist slogans.

“I have been jailed for two years and have never been put before a judge or court!” shouted one prisoner.

“We are not asking for food or water. Just free us. We have committed no crimes!” said another.

Mr Hashemi told the prisoners that the authorities were working to speed up their cases.

“We will not accept this injustice. It is a shame on all of us. Be patient,” he said.

“All of your cases will be heard.”

At one point he added: “You are lucky to be here. At least you have security.

“Those outside do not even have security.”

US forces and Iraq’s own security forces have imprisoned tens of thousands of detainees without charge in the four years since the fall of President Saddam Hussein.

Many of the prisoners held by both US and Iraqi authorities are Sunni Arabs accused of participating in the insurgency against the Shiite-led Government, and their treatment is an emotional issue for the Sunni Arab community.

The director of the prison visited by Mr Hashemi, Major-General Jumah Hussein, told Reuters by telephone that the tented camp was opened a month ago to relieve overcrowding at prisons throughout Iraq, and the complex now held 2779 prisoners.

He said the tents were built “according to international standards”, with air conditioning and 24-hour electricity.

“The prisoners arrived just a month ago,” he said.

“It is not our fault that some have been held for a year or two years without their cases going before a judge.

“We are drawing up lists of all the prisoners and will put all their cases before a court.”

The US military says it is now holding 23,000 Iraqis, 19,000 of them at Camp Bucca, a giant prison camp in southern Iraq.

Washington says its own prisoners are covered by UN Security Council resolutions which allow its forces to hold them without charge as long as they are deemed a threat.

Although US forces are not responsible for prisoners held by Iraqi authorities, “we encourage them to treat their prisoners with as much respect as is seen in the West,” said US military spokesman Lieutenant-Colonel Christopher Garver.

The Shiite-run Interior Ministry was criticised over the treatment of detainees in 2005 after US forces said they discovered secret cells in which detainees had been tortured.

Ground Zero Building Catches Fire, Doesn’t Collapse

August 19, 2007

Prisonplanet.com
Sunday Aug 19, 2007

 


The 40-storey Deutsche Bank building next to the ground zero site in New York, where the world trade center once stood, caught fire yesterday and burned intensely for seven hours without collapsing

This represents another modern day miracle in light of the commonly accepted premise that since 9/11, all steel buildings that suffer limited fire damage implode within two hours. This building had even suffered structural damage on 9/11 and had been partially dismantled.

The raging fire, which killed two firefighters, was finally declared under control late saturday afternoon, a full seven hours after it had begun to burn.

On 9/11 the south tower of the WTC burned for just 56 minutes before collapsing, while the north tower lasted around an hour and 45 minutes. According to the official transcripts of the firefighter tapes, fires in both towers were almost out immediately before the collapses.

More . . .