America fears Israeli strike against Iran over latest nuclear claim

November 8, 2007

Tom Baldwin in Washington, James Hider in Jerusalem and Francis Elliott, Deputy Political Editor A claim by President Ahmadinejad that Iran has 3,000 working uranium-enriching centrifuges sent a tremor across the world yesterday amid fears that Israel would respond by bombing the country’s nuclear facilities.

Military sources in Washington said that the existence of such a large number could be a “tipping point”, triggering an Israeli air strike. The Pentagon is reluctant to take military action against Iran, but officials say that Israel is a “different matter”. Amid the international uproar, British MPs who were to have toured the nuclear facility were backing out of their Iran trip.

Even before President Ahmadinejad’s announcement, a US defence official told The Times yesterday: “Israel could do something when they get to around 3,000 working centrifuges. The Pentagon is minded to wait a little longer.” US experts say 3,000 machines running for long periods could make enough enriched uranium for an atomic bomb within a year.

Keep reading . . .

What the upcoming Israeli/Palestinian peace summit should entail

November 7, 2007

uruknet.info

 

Dutch, USA – Axis of logic

November 6, 2007

“The tragedy of the Palestinian people is that their country was ‘given’ by a foreign power to another people for the creation of a new state. The result was that many hundreds of thousands of innocent people were made permanently homeless. With each new conflict their num- bers increase. How much longer is the world willing to endure this spectacle of wanton cruelty?” Bertrand Russell, Cairo 1970.


Today Israel occupies over 78% of the Palestinian peoples’ historic homeland of Palestine instead of its 55% UN share in 1948 and is responsible for almost wiping them and Palestine off the map by uprooting hundeds of thousands of innocent Palestinians from their homes and some 500 villages to make way for incoming settlers and condemn them to a wretched life in over crowded refugees for the last 60 years by refusing to allow them to return in accor- dance with UN Resolution 194.

Yet Israeli officials have the audacity to allow strangers from foreign continents to return to Israel and offers them generous incentives to live in the Palestinian territories. Lands they have illegally occupied since the 1967 war under international law.

Daily the Israeli Army violates the Palestinian peoples’ human rights and sovereign rights by keeping them under an illegal occupation and siege and by running roughshod over their land, conficating their natural resources, barring them from traveling on their roads and indeed barricading them at gunpoint behind checkpoints and a wall while their officials have the audacity to reject Hamas officials who were elected to represent their rights in a fair & clean election bid and target kills Palestinian militants who oppose their unlawful presence in the territories.

When will Israeli officials realize there are some laws and moral principles no one can violate and they need to withdraw their troops from the territories and evacuate their settlements and let the Palestinian people live their lives in peace? In solidarity, Dutch

P.S.

Not so nice facts about Israel:
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual
&videoid=2031994495

The Palestinian children prisoners of war :
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=FMb1Ye3qpWE

Palestinian children under attack from Israel i Army at the border:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=OLJzCNPm0qQ

Demonstrators Clash With Pakistan Police

November 7, 2007

AP News, November 7, 2007

By STEPHEN GRAHAM

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (AP) – Police swung batons and fired tear gas at supporters of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto demonstrating near Pakistan’s parliament Wednesday, deepening a political crisis triggered by the imposition of military rule.

Associated Press reporters saw hundreds of protesters pushing metal barricades into ranks of riot police blocking their path. Police beat several activists who broke through, and dragged at least three away from the scene.

State television said the parliament had endorsed President Gen. Pervez Musharraf’s state of emergency declaration.

The demonstrators pulled back after several rounds of tear gas were fired toward them.

Bhutto had called on supporters to defy a ban on protesting the imposition of emergency rule, even as the government threatened to crush her demonstrations.

She also said more than 400 members of her Pakistan People’s Party have been arrested.

Musharraf, who took power in a 1999 coup, suspended the constitution after declaring the state of emergency Saturday. He has since ousted independent-minded judges, put a stranglehold on the media and granted sweeping powers to authorities to crush dissent. Thousands of people have been rounded up and thrown in jail since then.

Continued . . .

General Musharraf Attempts to Crush Protests by Lawyers

November 7, 2007

The New York Times, November 6, 2007

Arif Ali/Agence France-Presse–Getty Images

Pakistani uniformed and plainclothes police beat a lawyer during a protest in Lahore on Monday.

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, Nov. 5 — Angry protests by thousands of lawyers in Lahore and other cities on Monday demonstrated the first organized resistance to the emergency rule imposed by the Pakistani president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf. But the abrupt arrests of many of them threatened to weaken their challenge.

Audio: Longer Version of Interview With David Rohde (mp3)

Lawyers Protest in PakistanAudio & Photos

Related

 

Enlarge This Image

Mohsin Raza/Reuters

Police officers beat a lawyer outside provincial High Courts in Lahore on Monday.

The real test of whether the opposition to General Musharraf will prevail appears to be several days off: The leader of the biggest opposition political party, Benazir Bhutto, has pledged to lead a major protest rally on Friday in Rawalpindi, the garrison city adjacent to Islamabad, the capital.

The Musharraf government’s resolve to silence its fiercest opponents was evident in the strength of the crackdown by baton-wielding police officers who pummeled lawyers and then hauled them by the legs and arms into police wagons in Lahore.

At one point, lawyers and police officers clashed in a pitched battle, with lawyers standing on the roof of the High Court throwing stones at the police below, and the police hurling them back. Some of the lawyers were bleeding from the head, and some passed out in clouds of tear gas.

It was the second time this year that Pakistan’s lawyers emerged as the vanguard of resistance to the government. In the spring, the lawyers mounted big rallies in major cities when General Musharraf tried to dismiss the chief justice, Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, who has now been fired.

How long the lawyers can keep up their revolt now without the support of opposition political parties, which so far have been lying low, remains in question.

There were conflicting estimates of the number of lawyers in jail in Lahore on Monday night. Some lawyers said that as many as 500 to 700 of their colleagues were in custody, scattered in various police cells and jails.

Continued . . .

For Pakistanis, fired justice is symbol of defiance

November 7, 2007

 The deposed head of the Supreme Court is seen as one of the few to stand up to a dictator.

By Laura King, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
November 7, 2007

ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN — Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry is an unlikely folk hero.

The deposed chief justice has a gruff demeanor, a hangdog face, a thick mustache, and is slightly cross-eyed. No one would call him charismatic.

 

Iftikhar M. Chaudhry

Iftikhar M. Chaudhry

click to enlarge

 

Pakistani lawyers climb on the closed gates of the District Courts

Pakistani lawyers climb on the closed gates of the District Courts

click to enlarge

 

Protests continue

Protests continue

click to enlarge

 

Protesters and police clash in Pakistan

Photo Gallery

Protesters and police clash in Pakistan

Related Stories

 

But the 59-year-old has rock-star status in Pakistan, where he has become a prime symbol of defiance of President Pervez Musharraf.

His image adorns posters and T-shirts. Crowds would surround his car, making it difficult for him to move about. Rallies in his support after Musharraf’s first attempt to fire him drew some of the biggest turnouts ever here.

Pakistan has spent about half of its 60-year history under military rule, and in openly challenging a leader with near-absolute authority, Chaudhry has done what few others have dared.

On March 9, when Musharraf summoned him to army headquarters and ordered him to resign, the chief justice refused to go quietly. He stuck to that refusal, even when confronted with a roomful of military men insisting that he quit.

Musharraf then suspended him on misconduct charges that the justice’s supporters said were trumped up.

Chaudhry was a popular figure even before Musharraf first tried to sideline him. As chief justice of the country’s Supreme Court, he had tackled issues that embarrassed the government — human rights cases, so-called honor killings, a lucrative privatization deal involving the prime minister, secret detentions by the intelligence services.

Protests over his suspension, led by the same lawyers who are now at the forefront of demonstrations against emergency rule, started small, but snowballed. Huge crowds turned out when he traveled to cities around the country to address local bar associations

By May, he was considered such a threat to government interests that a pro-Musharraf party physically prevented him from leaving the airport in Karachi, the country’s largest city, where he had flown for an appearance. More than 40 people were killed in street battles that day.

Chaudhry’s legal background was not a glamorous one. Born into a lower-middle-class family in the southwestern city of Quetta, he spent years as a jack-of-all-trades provincial lawyer, taking on whatever case came his way.

But he made his way steadily upward, was appointed as a provincial high court justice in 1990, and ascended to the Supreme Court bench in 2000. He became chief justice in 2005.

In the beginning, he wasn’t a firebrand. During his early tenure on the high court, he went along with the government, voting with the court majority that validated Musharraf’s military coup in 1999 and subsequent appointment as president.

But Chaudhry gradually asserted himself, eventually becoming an intolerable thorn in Musharraf’s side. When the general fired him Saturday night after declaring an emergency, the court was days away from ruling on whether Musharraf’s election as president last month was valid.

Refusing to take a loyalty oath to Musharraf, Chaudhry was confined to his official residence, surrounded by paramilitary troops. Loyalists anxiously awaited word from him.

When it came, the message was defiant.

“I am under arrest now,” he told supporters by telephone. “But soon I will join you in your struggle.”

laura.king@latimes.com

Musharraf plays his hand craftily

November 7, 2007

The Toronto Star, Nov 06, 2007 04:30 AM

  COLUMNIST

It is being said that Gen. Pervez Musharraf, America’s favourite dictator, may have miscalculated American reaction to his declaration of a state of emergency. On the contrary, in calling Washington’s bluff, he has calculated the odds only too well.

The United States, Canada and other NATO allies have left themselves little choice but to keep backing him to let him continue his war on terror, however intermittently.

Critics may be equally off base in saying that the changed situation in Pakistan may complicate the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan. Arguably, it could help.

The third theme to emerge in the wake of the general’s dismissal of senior Supreme Court judges, suspension of media freedoms and the arrests of key opposition figures has been that democracy has been dealt a death blow.

One could say that with a straight face only if one believed that the recent soap operatic return of Benazir Bhutto from exile and her participation in a national election from which she would re-emerge as prime minister were something other than a U.S.-orchestrated plan to give a democratic gloss to the eight-year-old military rule, with Musharraf remaining as president, albeit in civilian clothes.

Keep reading . . .

This year deadliest for U.S. troops in Iraq

November 6, 2007

Reuters, Tue Nov 6, 2007, 11:39 AM ET

BAGHDAD (Reuters) – Seven U.S. soldiers were killed in Iraq on Monday, the U.S. military said, making 2007 the deadliest year for U.S. forces in the country.

The deaths, one of the highest daily tolls in weeks, took the number of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq this year to 853. The worst previous year was 2004, when 849 deaths were recorded.

In total, 3,856 U.S. soldiers have been killed since the U.S.-led invasion to topple Saddam Hussein in 2003.

“We lost five soldiers yesterday in two unfortunate incidents, both involving IEDs (Improvised Explosive Devices),” U.S. military spokesman Rear Admiral Greg Smith told reporters in Baghdad on Tuesday.

The military said both attacks took place in Kirkuk province near the volatile oil-refining city of Baiji, 180 km (112 miles) north of Baghdad. In the worst incident, four soldiers were killed when a roadside bomb exploded near their vehicle.

A sixth soldier was killed in western Anbar province, once one of the most dangerous places in Iraq for U.S. troops but now seen as a success story for U.S. President George W. Bush’s new Iraq strategy since Sunni tribes there turned against al Qaeda.

A sailor was also killed on Monday in an explosion during operations in Salahuddin province, the military said.

Keep reading . . .

Iftikhar Choudhry calls on lawyers to resist Musharraf

November 6, 2007

The Hindu, November 6, 2007

ISLAMABAD (AP): Pakistan’s deposed chief justice called on lawyers nationwide to defy baton-wielding police and protest President Gen. Pervez Musharraf’s imposition of emergency rule.

“Go to every corner of Pakistan and give the message that this is the time to sacrifice,” Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, who is under virtual house arrest in Islamabad, told lawyers by mobile phone Monday. “Don’t be afraid. God will help us and the day will come when you’ll see the constitution supreme and no dictatorship for a long time.”

Later, in the central city of Multan, hundreds of police blocked about 1,000 attorneys from leaving a district court complex to stage a street rally in defiance of a ban. Both sides pelted each other with stones and officers swung batons to disperse the crowd.

An Associated Press reporter saw at least three wounded lawyers, two bleeding from the head. Three police were also hurt by bricks flung by lawyers.

The clashes marked the second day of unrest since Musharraf, who took power in a 1999 coup, declared the emergency. He suspended the constitution, ousted independent-minded judges, put a stranglehold on the media and granted sweeping powers to authorities to crush dissent. Thousands of people have been rounded up and thrown in jail.

Keep reading . . .

Bush and Musharraf’s grand illusion

November 6, 2007

Salon.com

Democracy for Pakistan was never the deal — and as Musharraf’s latest power grab throws his nation into turmoil, Bush will gladly go along.

By Juan Cole

Photo: AP/Gerald Herbert

President Bush shakes hands with Pakistan President Gen. Pervez Musharraf Sept. 22, 2006, after a White House press conference.

Nov. 6, 2007 | In the fall of 1999, as he campaigned for the presidency, George W. Bush was asked by a reporter to name the leader of Pakistan. Bush could not. He famously replied: “The new Pakistani general, he’s just been elected — not elected, this guy took over office. It appears this guy is going to bring stability to the country, and I think that’s good news for the subcontinent.” Although Bush didn’t know Gen. Pervez Musharraf’s name and was confused as to how he got into office, the soon-to-be American president was sanguine about the anti-democratic developments in Pakistan.

More than seven years later, Bush’s illusions about Musharraf — and any illusion of democracy in Pakistan — have been shattered by the dictator’s declaration of a state of emergency. Tantamount to a coup, Musharraf’s actions on Saturday have not only thrown Pakistan into turmoil but have also revealed the hypocrisy of Bush’s foreign policy, including the proclaimed goal of fostering freedom and the rule of law in the Muslim world.

Keep reading . . . 

Thousands face down Pakistani police

November 5, 2007

Yahoo News, November 5, 2007By Munir Ahmad, Associated Press Writer

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan – Police fired tear gas and clubbed thousands of lawyers protesting President Gen. Pervez Musharraf ‘s decision to impose emergency rule, as Western allies threatened to review aid to the troubled Muslim nation. More than 1,500 people have been arrested in 48 hours, and authorities put a stranglehold on independent media.

Musharraf, who took power in a 1999 coup and is also head of Pakistan‘s army, suspended the constitution on Saturday ahead of a Supreme Court ruling on whether his recent re-election as president was legal. He ousted independent-minded judges and granted sweeping powers to authorities to crush dissent.

Though public anger was mounting in the nation of 160 million people, which has been under military rule for much of its 60-year history, demonstrations so far have been limited largely to activists, rights workers and lawyers. All have been quickly and sometimes brutally
stamped out.

Continued . . .