Peace and Justice Post

My Way, December 21, 2007

By MATT APUZZO

(AP) David Remes, a lawyer who represents a Yemeni national and other detainees, right, walks to the… Full Image

Counterpunch, December 21, 2007

By Jacob G. Hornberger 

Neo-con supporters of the U.S. government’s war of aggression against Iraq are undoubtedly holding their collective breath in the hope that U.S. military forces have finally smashed any further violent opposition to their conquest of Iraq. The attitude would then be, “You see, this shows that we were right after all to invade and occupy Iraq and kill and maim hundreds of thousands of Iraqi people.”

Meanwhile, the Associated Press is reporting that U.S. soldiers have found mass graves next to a torture center north of Baghdad. In the torture center, chains were attached to blood-spattered walls while a metal bed was attached to an electrical shock system.

Hey, who knows? Maybe the torture center prevented a ticking time bomb from going off? And who’s to say that chains, blood-spattered walls, metal beds, and an electrical shock system really constitute torture? Doesn’t torture depend on each person’s subjective determination of the term?

By the way, wasn’t there torture in Iraq under Saddam Hussein? I wonder if his justifications for torture were different from those employed by those torturing in Iraq today. I wonder if they were different than those employed by current U.S. torturers.

Coninued . . . 

War In Iraq

By Press TV on: 21.12.2007

Putin named Time magazine’s ‘Person of the Year’
Russian leader Vladimir Putin has said that the events of the last years show the great mistake committed by the US when it invaded Iraq.

Russia considered such a decision was wrong from the start, and there is no solid argument now to change our criteria, Putin told Time magazine who named him ‘Person of the Year’ on Wednesday.

The Russian president said the Iraqi people, though a small population, are proud, and took the US-UK military occupation as a particular offense to their country, creating problems never seen in that country before.

Putin said he had differences with US President George W. Bush, particularly his arguments that he cannot set a concrete time limit for withdrawal of foreign troops.

Putin said the best thing to do is remove the troops as soon as possible to leave control with the local authorities.

ABZ/PA

Antiwar.com, December 21, 2007

By Aaron Glantz

Congress’ approval Wednesday of $70 billion more for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan mean the twin conflicts are now more costly to American taxpayers than the war in Vietnam.

According to a study by the Washington-based Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, Congress has now approved nearly $700 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“Using inflation-adjusted dollars, the total cost of those wars has now surpassed the total cost of the Vietnam war (which ran to $670 billion),” the group’s Travis Sharp told OneWorld. “It’s also more than seven times larger than the Persian Gulf War ($94 billion) and more than twice the cost of the Korean war ($295 billion).”

As a result of Wednesday’s vote, Sharp said, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will become the second costliest conflict in American history, trailing only World War II.

Keep reading . . . 

The Nation, January 29, 2007

(The following speech was made by Sen. George McGovern on January 12, 2007. As an old experienced senator, he had raised some important questions about President Bush’s war policies.)

Sen. George McGovern

I’m glad to be back at the National Press Club. Indeed, at the age of eighty-four, I’m glad to be anywhere. In my younger years when the subject of aging came up, trying to sound worldly wise, I would say, “It doesn’t matter so much the number of years you have, but what you do with those years.” I don’t say that anymore. I now want to reach a hundred. Why? Because I thoroughly enjoy life and there are so many things I must still do before entering the mystery beyond. The most urgent of these is to get American soldiers out of the Iraqi hellhole Bush-Cheney and their neoconservative theorists have created in what was once called the cradle of civilization. It is believed to be the location of the Garden of Eden. I mention the neoconservative theorists to recall Walter Lippman’s observance, “There is nothing so dangerous as a belligerent professor.”

Keep reading . . .

Middle East Times

Mel Frykberg | published December 20, 2007

The crowd of Hebron settlers shouted, “Gas the Arabs” and, “Death to the Arabs” as they forced open the door of Hasham al-Azzer’s home which borders the neighboring settlement of Tel Rumeida, about 20 miles south of Jerusalem.

The water pipes outside had already been destroyed, the grapevines poisoned, olive branches cut, and garbage from the Jewish settlement strewn on the pathway approaching the front door. Once inside they proceeded to wreak havoc, smashing furniture, computers and windows, scribbling graffiti on the walls, upturning personal belongings, and emptying the contents of cupboards and drawers onto the floors.

After a couple of hours of wanton destruction, the settlers left. Azzer, whose family has lived in the same home for generations, eventually returned and tried to salvage what remained of his property. The settlers had warned him over the preceding months that they would drive him out.

Keep reading . . .

Telegraph, UK, December 20, 2007
By Sophie Borland

The Archbishop of Canterbury said yesterday that the Christmas story of the Three Wise Men was nothing but a ‘legend’.

Transcript: Archbishop’s interview with Simon Mayo Damian Thompson: Another of Rowan Williams’ own goals Midnight mass at 8pm to fool drunks Dr Rowan Williams has claimed there was little evidence that the Magi even existed and there was certainly nothing to prove there were three of them or that they were kings.   Dr Williams argued that the traditional Christmas story was nothing but a ‘legend’ He said the only reference to the wise men from the East was in Matthew’s gospel and the details were very vague. Dr Williams said: “Matthew’s gospel says they are astrologers, wise men, priests from somewhere outside the Roman Empire, that’s all we’re really told. It works quite well as legend.” The Archbishop went on to dispel other details of the Christmas story, adding that there were probably no asses or oxen in the stable. He argued that Christmas cards which showed the Virgin Mary cradling the baby Jesus, flanked by shepherds and wise men, were misleading. As for the scenes that depicted snow falling in Bethlehem, the Archbishop said the chance of this was “very unlikely”. In a final blow to the traditional nativity story, Dr Williams concluded that Jesus was probably not born in December at all. He said: “Christmas was when it was because it fitted well with the winter festival.” His comments came during an interview on BBC Radio 5 Live with Simon Mayo yesterday. Later on in the show, the Archbishop was challenged by fellow guest Ricky Gervais, the comedian, about the credibility of the Christmas story.

Asia Times, December 19, 2007

By Sudha Ramachandran

BANGALORE – A month of acrimonious campaigning is over and voters have cast their ballots in assembly elections in the western Indian state of Gujarat. Bookies and exit polls indicate that Narendra Modi, Gujarat’s controversial chief minister, is likely to come back for another term at the helm.

This is distressing news for Gujarat’s religious minorities and for secular-democrats across India. Modi’s ideology, actions and public style are widely seen as a threat not only to Indian secularism – he thrives on stoking hatred against India’s Muslims – but also to its democracy.

The outcome of the election is being keenly watched not just by Indians but by foreign governments as well.

Modi’s fans see him as a messiah, someone who “has taught Muslims a lesson”. He is also credited with having brought vibrancy to Gujarat’s economy. His critics describe him as a “barbaric butcher” of Muslims in Gujarat, an “Indian Hitler” and the architect of the 2002 anti-Muslim pogrom in Gujarat.

In early 2002, Gujarat witnessed a frenzy of communal violence, when mobs targeted members of the Muslim community in the state, after Hindu pilgrims were killed in an alleged attack on a train. Modi turned a blind eye to the killing, raping and looting of Muslims. Among those who carried out the massacres were members of Modi’s party, the right wing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and others of the Sangh Parivar, a family of Hindu right wing organizations. Around 2,000 people, mostly Muslims, were killed and tens of thousands were displaced in the violence.

Keep reading . . .

Times of India, December 16, 2007
By Shobhan Saxena

The ruins were so magnificent and sprawling that some people believed that the aliens from a faraway galaxy had built the huge pyramids that stood in the desert across the Andes.

Some historians believed that the complex society, which existed at that time, was born out of fear and war. They looked for the telltale signs of violence that they believed led to the creation of this civilisation. But, they could not find even a hint of any warfare. It was baffling. Even years after Ruth Shady Solis found the ancient city of pyramids at Caral in Peru, it continues to surprise historians around the world. It took Ruth Shady many years and many rounds of carbon dating to prove that the earliest known civilisation in South Americas—at 2,627 BC–was much older than the Harappa Valley towns and the pyramids of Egypt.

Solis, an archaeologist at the National University of San Marcos, Lima, was looking for the fabled missing link of archaeology— a ‘mother city’—when she stumbled upon the ancient city of Caral in the Supe Valley of Peru a few years ago. Her findings were stunning.

Keep reading . . .

Consortiumnews.com, December 18, 2007

By Brent Budowsky

Editor’s Note: Increasingly, U.S. government officials, including senior military officers, must go through verbal gymnastics to avoid implicating George W. Bush in an obvious crime: the authorization to torture al-Qaeda suspects.

In this guest essay, former congressional staffer Brent Budowsky warns that the rhetorical gyrations are now endangering U.S. troops:

In unprecedented congressional testimony, Brig. Gen. Thomas Hartmann recently refused to say it would be illegal for American POWs to be tortured through waterboarding by our enemies.

He couldn’t because a policy claimed to be legal when committed by our government would be equally legal when committed by our enemies against our troops and POWs.

The legal perversion of Gen. Hartmann’s testimony would outrage American military families.

It dramatizes how alien this torture policy is from two centuries of American military and legal tradition, when an American general cannot defend the time honored rights of American POWs, and America’s enemies could use his testimony as their defense for torture against our troops.

Keep reading . . .