Truth was first US casualty in Iraq war: study

January 24, 2008

Yahoo News, January 23, 2008

AFP

WASHINGTON (AFP) – US President George W. Bush and his top officials ran roughshod over the truth in the run-up to the Iraq war lying a total of 935 times, a study released Wednesday found.

Bush and his administration “waged a carefully orchestrated campaign of misinformation about the threat posed by Saddam Hussein‘s Iraq,” said the damning report entitled “False Pretenses.”

According to the Center for Public Integrity, eight administration officials “made at least 935 false statements” about Iraq’s possession of weapons of mass destruction, or links to Al-Qaeda, on 532 separate occasions.

“In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information that it methodically propagated and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003.”

Continued . . .

The Empire That Must Be Obeyed

January 24, 2008

Counterpunch, January 23, 2008

What Gives the US the Right to Claim a Moral Monopoly Over the World?

By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

“The first use of nuclear weapons must remain in the quiver of escalation as the ultimate instrument to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction.”

Five Western military leaders.

I read the statement three times trying to figure out the typo. Then it hit me, the West has now out-Owellled Orwell: The West must nuke other countries in order to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction! In Westernspeak, the West nuking other countries does not qualify as the use of weapons of mass destruction.

The astounding statement comes from a paper prepared for a Nato summit in April by five top military leaders–an American, a German, a Dutchman, a Frenchman, and a Brit. It can be found here.

The paper, prepared by men regarded as distinguished leaders and not as escapees from insane asylums, argues that “the West’s values and way of life are under threat, but the West is struggling to summon the will to defend them.” The leaders find that the UN is in the way of the West’s will, as is the European Union which is obstructing NATO and “NATO’s credibility is at stake in Afghanistan.”

And that’s a serious matter. If NATO loses its credibility in Afghanistan, Western civilization will collapse just like the Soviet Union. The West just doesn’t realize how weak it is. To strengthen itself, it needs to drop more and larger bombs.

Keep reading . . .

Palestinians rush into Egypt after border blasts

January 24, 2008

 Telegraph.co.Uk, January 24, 2008

By Tim Butcher on the Egyptian side of Gaza’s border

Tens of thousands of Palestinians swept into Egypt after Hamas militants blew holes in Israeli-built border defences that had kept them penned inside the crowded Gaza Strip.

  • The day Gaza’s Berlin Wall came down
  • Listen now: Tim Butcher describes the Egypt wall breach
  • Leader: Hamas can’t be ignored
  • With Egypt showing no appetite to restore order immediately, Israel’s decades-old control of goods and people reaching Gaza was brought to an end the instant explosive charges punched eight holes in the concrete and steel frontier.

    It immediately relieved pressure from the recent blockade imposed by Israel on Gaza to try to stop Palestinian militants firing rockets across the perimeter fence into the Jewish state.

    And it raised the very real threat of Palestinian militants ramping up arms smuggling into Gaza from Egypt to increase attacks on Israel.

    The international community appeared wrong-footed by the border breach with the United Nations appealing for calm and Jordan warning any Israeli retaliation could derail the peace process.

    Coninued . . . 

    Cheney Impeachment Gains Traction

    January 23, 2008

    Race Against the Clock

    Counterpunch, January 22, 2008

    By MARJORIE COHN

    Nine out of 23 Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee favor starting impeachment hearings against Vice-President Dick Cheney. Six of the nine are co-sponsors of H.R. 799, which contains three articles of impeachment.

    Articles I and II of H.R. 799 accuse Cheney of purposely manipulating intelligence to deceive Congress and the American people about a fabricated threat of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, and about an alleged relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda, respectively. Article III charges Cheney with openly threatening aggression against Iran absent any real threat to the United States. All three articles say Cheney’s actions have damaged our national security interests.

    Three of the nine Judiciary Committee Democrats who advocate launching impeachment hearings against Cheney, Reps. Robert Wexler (D., Fla.), Luis Gutierrez (D., Ill.) and Tammy Baldwin (D., Wis.), co-authored an op-ed that appeared on December 27 in the Philadelphia Inquirer.

    Keep reading . . .

    One Day of the Iraq War=720 Million Dollars (video)

    January 23, 2008

    American Friend’s Service Committee

     

    January 22, 2008

    One Day=720 Million Dollars is a video just put out by the American Friend’s Service Committee.

    Please forward this video to others. Please keep up action to end this ILLEGAL war.

    About this video: Visit http://www.afsc.org/cost to tell Congress how you want your tax dollars spent. The Iraq war has taken the lives of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and thousands of U.S. military personnel. It is also costing $720 Million dollars each day – dollars that could be spent in much more constructive ways. It is time to DEFUND the war and RE-FUND human needs in the U.S. and Iraq. Sign our petition at http://www.afsc.org/cost – and send this video to ten friends.

    Study: False statements preceded war

    January 23, 2008

    Study: Bush, Other Officials Issued Hundreds of False Statements Before Iraq Invasion

    Staff
    AP News

    Jan 22, 2008 20:48 EST

    A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations found that President Bush and top administration officials issued hundreds of false statements about the national security threat from Iraq in the two years following the 2001 terrorist attacks.

    The study concluded that the statements “were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses.”The study was posted Tuesday on the Web site of the Center for Public Integrity, which worked with the Fund for Independence in Journalism. The White House did not immediately return a phone call for comment.

    The study counted 935 false statements in the two-year period. It found that in speeches, briefings, interviews and other venues, Bush and administration officials stated unequivocally on at least 532 occasions that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction or was trying to produce or obtain them or had links to al-Qaida or both.

    Keep reading . . .

    Former senior military officials: “NATO must prepare to launch nuclear attack”

    January 23, 2008
    Global Research, January 22, 2008
    Nato must prepare to launch pre-emptive nuclear attacks to ward off the use of weapons of mass destruction by its enemies, a group of former senior military officials has warned.

    Calling for a major change to Nato’s approach to defending its members and their interests, the authors of the report, which has been handed to Nato and Pentagon chiefs, said the first-strike use of nuclear weapons was a “indispensable instrument”.

    The authors of the blueprint for reforming Nato are understood to include Lord Peter Inge, the former British chief of the defence staff and US General John Shalikashvili, the former Nato commander in Europe and chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff.

    “The risk of further proliferation is imminent and, with it, the danger that nuclear war fighting, albeit limited in scope, might become possible,” the report said.

    “The first use of nuclear weapons must remain in the quiver of escalation as the ultimate instrument to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction.”

    The document reportedly includes Lord Inge’s comments on the controversy surrounding nuclear weapons policy: “To tie our hands on first use or no first use removes a huge plank of deterrence.”

    The report called for a wholesale reform of Nato and a new pack between Nato, the US and the European Union in order to tackle modern military and terrorist threats to the West.

    It warned the spread of nuclear technology meant there was “simply no realistic prospect of a nuclear-free world”.

    Terrorism, political fanaticism and religious fundamentalism were major threats to the West, and organised crime, climate change and migration on a mass scale posed dangers to the way of life of Nato members.

    The report’s authors also cited the weakening of global alliances, including the United Nations.

    The authors have proposed major changes to the way Nato operates, including abandoning consensus decision making so fast action can be taken without the threat of vetoes and caveats imposed by some nations.

    They also called for military action without ratification by the UN in cases where “immediate action is needed to protect large numbers of human beings”.

    The report was compiled after authors were briefed by senior serving military officials who are unable to speak publicly about their concerns with Nato’s military strategy.

    The document may be discussed at a Nato summit in Bucharest in April.

    The other three authors are Klaus Naumann, a German former military commander, Henk van den Breemen, a former Dutch military official, and Jacques Lanxade, the former French admiral and chief of defence.

    American pressure thwarts UN censure of Gaza Strip blockade

    January 23, 2008

    Information Clearing House

    By Shlomo Shamir and Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondents, and News Agencies

    21/01/08 ” Haaretz.” — – -The United Nations Security Council will not approve a resolution condemning Israel over the closure of the Gaza Strip, due to pressure applied by the United States.
    The council will instead issue a Presidential Statement on the matter when it meets to discuss the situation in Gaza.

    According to a draft of the statement obtained by Haaretz, the Security Council will express “its deep concern about the deterioration of the situation in the occupied Palestinian territory.”

    “The Security Council also expresses concern in particular about the steep deterioration of the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip, due to the continued closure of all of the Gaza Strip border crossings and the recent decision by the Israeli government to reduce fuel supplies, to cut off electric power, and to prevent the delivery of food and medical supplies to the Gaza Strip,” the draft says.

    “The Security Council calls upon Israel to abide by its obligations under international law including humanitarian and human rights law and immediately cease all its illegal measures and practices against the Palestinian civilian population in the Gaza Strip,” continued the draft statement.

    Continued . . .

    The Emails that Dick Cheney Deleted

    January 23, 2008

    RINF.com, January 22, 2008

    Harper’s Magazine

    Late last week, right after official White House spokesmen made a series of either evasive or completely false statements about the mysterious case of the vanishing, then reappearing, then perhaps no really vanished White House emails, Henry Waxman and his Oversight Committee announced some of the conclusions they had reached.

    Dan Eggen and Elizabeth Williamson published an account of it on Friday in the Washington Post:

    The White House possesses no archived e-mail messages for many of its component offices, including the Executive Office of the President and the Office of the Vice President, for hundreds of days between 2003 and 2005, according to the summary of an internal White House study that was disclosed yesterday by a congressional Democrat. The 2005 study — whose credibility the White House attacked this week — identified 473 separate days in which no electronic messages were stored for one or more White House offices, said House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.).

    Keep reading . . .

    War in Congo kills 45,000 people each month

    January 23, 2008

    · Decade-long conflict is most deadly since 1945
    · Half of dying are small children, survey shows

    Chris McGreal in Johannesburg
    Wednesday January 23, 2008
    The Guardian

    Democratic Republic of Congo children
    Congolese children show off war-themed toys made from clay in a UN refugee camp. Photograph: Geert Vanden Wijngaert/AP

    A decade of fighting in the Democratic Republic of Congo is continuing to kill about 45,000 people each month – half of them small children – in the deadliest conflict since the second world war, according to a new survey.

    The International Rescue Committee said preventable diseases and starvation aggravated by conflict have claimed 5.4 million lives since the beginning of the second Congo war in 1998, equivalent to the population of Denmark. Although the war officially ended in 2002, malaria, diarrhoea, pneumonia and malnutrition continue to claim thousands of lives.

    Keep reading . . .