What cut cables can teach

February 7, 2008
Posted: 2008/02/06
From: Mathaba

 
  Mathaba’s Dr Bleher, a logical German, looks at some of the lessons that can be learned from the recent cuts of undersea Internet cables, not least that the public still seem to believe any fairy tales the so-called MSM “Mainstream Media” tell them, no matter how illogical.

By Dr Sahib Mustaqim Bleher

Arguably, the most important, albeit not particularly spectacular, event of last week was the consecutive cutting of four major fibre optic communication cables in the Mediterranean, the Persian Gulf and North of the Egyptian coast. I say, consecutive, because had they all been cut simultaneously, it would be unprecedented but could still be called an accident. As there was a considerable time lapse, however, the probabilities of an accident are slim, more so since the theory that the cables were cut by ship anchors has since been discredited with the confirmation from the Egyptian ministry of communication that no ships were present in the area at the time the cables were cut.

This leaves sabotage or an act of war as the only other option. The fact that there were no immediate American condemnations of this as a terrorist act indicates that it had the tacit approval of the United States, a theory further supported by the fact that Israel and Iraq remained unaffected since their internet traffic is carried via a different route. Without wanting to speculate, however, a number of interesting lessons emerge from these events.

Firstly, the internet has proven surprisingly resilient, managing to compensate for the lost traffic routes without collapsing altogether. It also demonstrated the complicated nature of the worldwide web, with India most heavily affected by a break in communications located in the Middle East, which in turn affected Britain in particular, since most large British companies have outsourced their call centres to India. There is, therefore, no way to disrupt the internet selectively without a knock-on effect elsewhere.

Secondly, the public appears to happily buy any story it is fed by mainstream media. Tell them a ship’s anchor cut through the cables and they believe it. They won’t ask why after such an “unforeseen” event no measures were put in place to prevent the same thing from happening again, or why suddenly so many lethal ship’s anchors are floating around the ocean when previously they never caused a problem. This public lethargy does not bode well for the future.

Thirdly, today’s wars are increasingly related to technology and communications. In a report to Congress, US National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell listed amongst his major concerns besides “Al-Qaeda” that Russia, China and oil producing countries were using their wealth to advance political goals (let’s guess that the USA could never possibly be accused of such a heinous crime!) and that the threats faced by the US were global, complex and dangerous, including the vulnerability of computer systems.

The truth is, that Iran’s nuclear capability has never really worried the White House as they know too well Iran would not be stupid enough to use such destructive technology even if they had it. It is a smoke screen for allowing interference on account of much more conventional capabilities Iran has developed like, for example, the recently announced ability to launch its own rocket and soon send its own satellites into orbit.

In this context, there have been speculations that the cutting of the internet cables was intended to cut off Arab oil producing states from vital communication routes prior to another weapon in Iran’s armoury, the long-awaited and heavily speculated about Iranian oil bourse which, by trading in Euro, would send the already free-falling dollar to depths from which it could never recover.

Unlike the Arab states, for example, Iran and China seem to have understood that economic warfare can be much more effective in bringing down an enemy than military engagement. Of course, they are not alone, the US and the UK have been using economic warfare as part of their arsenal for many decades.

Those opposed to being enslaved by the world hegemony of corporate America under the guise of “globalisation” should take heart in the knowledge that the internet remains one of their most potent weapons to fight back – a weapon which cannot be wrestled from them by the big powers without those powers shooting themselves in the foot. At the same time, they must be even more alert and try to wake up the general public – hitherto sedated by consumerism and entertainment and frightened by purported threats of terrorism as well as the real threat of bankruptcy and economic loss.

The US economy, and with it its political influence, is about to collapse, and we don’t expect it to surrender any more quietly than a fish flapping violently after having been removed from the water.

— Dr Sahib Mustaqim Bleher is a Mathaba Author, visit his page for more articles at:

 
 

Iraq’s Tragic Future

February 7, 2008

Truthdig, Feb 5, 2008

Iraqi
AP photo / Khalid Mohammed
Mohammed Salman sits in the rubble of what used to be a book market in Baghdad. His brother died in the explosion.

By Scott Ritter

Any analysis of the current state of the ongoing U.S. occupation of Iraq that relied solely on the U.S. government, the major candidates for president or the major media outlets in the United States for information would be hard pressed to find any bad news. In a State of the Union address which had everything except a “Mission Accomplished” banner flying in the background, President Bush all but declared victory over the insurgency in Iraq. His recertification of the success of the so-called surge has prompted the Republican candidates to assume a cocky swagger when discussing Iraq. They embrace the occupation and speak, without shame or apparent fear of retribution, of an ongoing presence in that war-torn nation. Their Democratic counterparts have been less than enthusiastic in their criticism of the escalation. And the media, for the most part, continue their macabre role as cheerleaders of death, hiding the reality of Iraq deep inside stories that build upon approving headlines derived from nothing more than political rhetoric. The war in Iraq, we’re told, is virtually over. We only need “stay the course” for 10 more years.

Continued . . .

Barack Obama and the Euphoria of Madness — Keeping It Real

February 7, 2008

Black Commentator, January 31, 2008
By Larry Pinkney,
BC Editorial Board

Those who ignore reality and the lessons of history do so at their own peril. Ignoring reality, whether in a state of euphoria or not, is nonetheless a sure recipe for disaster.

It is both sad and simultaneously horribly fascinating to observe so many euphorically pinning their hopes and dreams on Barack Obama, a chameleon who speaks liberally of “change” but who is, himself, beholden to the very same blood-sucking corporate vampires (including Lockheed and others) who are ravaging the peoples of America, and the entire planet. It seems we have moved euphemistically from Dracula to a corporately repackaged Blackula in the person of Barack Obama. In the very name of “change,” Obama is moving America euphorically backwards.

All of America, but most especially we Black, Brown, and Red peoples, need to pay heed to the unfolding debacle known as the “Obama phenomenon.” This so-called “phenomenon” is propelled by blind euphoria, while being steeped in double-speak and disinformation. The danger in this is self-evident.

Never mind that Barack Obama is a stalwart supporter of apartheid / corporate Zionism and is beholden to the Zionist corporate lobby in the US, which wags the people of America as a whole to the tune of billions upon billions of dollars from the coffers of this nation. It should be noted that Barack Obama made it quite clear in The Jerusalem Post newspaper (Israel) of January 29, 2008, that the Palestinian people whose lands are, and have long been, illegally and militarily occupied by Israel, “do not have the right of return.”

Continued . . .

Israeli forces kill six gunmen and teacher in Gaza

February 7, 2008

swissinfo.ch, Feb 7, 2008

By Nidal al-Mughrabi

GAZA (Reuters) – Israeli troops backed by tanks, helicopter gunships and warplanes killed six Palestinian gunmen and a schoolteacher in a raid in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip on Thursday, militant groups and hospital officials said.

Israel has stepped up military action against Hamas since it claimed responsibility for a Palestinian suicide bombing on Monday, the first such attack by the Islamist faction inside the Jewish state since 2004.

Residents said tanks and heavy bulldozers penetrated the border fence near the northern town of Jabalya. Israeli forces also struck in nearby Beit Hanoun, a border community often used by Palestinian militants to fire rockets into Israel.

Hamas, the ruling Islamist group, said five of its gunmen were killed fighting the Israeli troops. Another gunman, from Islamic Jihad, also died in the clashes, it said.

An Israeli missile hit a school in Beit Hanoun, killing a teacher and wounding three pupils, hospital officials said.

Continued . . .

Worries Surround Pakistani Elections

February 7, 2008

Fairness of Process Is Widely Doubted; Violent Reaction by Losers Seen Likely

By Pamela Constable
Washington Post Foreign Service
Thursday, February 7, 2008; A16

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, Feb. 6 — Despite the candidates’ colorful posters papering road signs and storefronts, the political atmosphere two weeks before Pakistan‘s parliamentary elections is as bleak and foreboding as the gray winter sky shrouding much of the country.

Candidates have largely abstained from any meaningful campaigning given their fears of bombings and the government’s decision to discourage large public rallies. The December assassination of former prime minister Benazir Bhutto has left the opposition without its most popular leader and cast a persistent pall over the run-up to the elections.

Many Pakistanis are convinced that the Feb. 18 polling will be systematically rigged by the caretaker government and that, as a result, angry opposition supporters will erupt in violence. While U.S. and European officials have pressed Pakistan to proceed with the vote, some here still expect the elections to be postponed at the last minute. Even if the vote is held, its credibility will be in doubt.

Continued . . .

CIA admits waterboarding of terror suspects

February 7, 2008
From February 7, 2008

It was a good day to bury bad news. As millions of Americans were glued to the most exciting presidential race in living memory, the Bush Administration admitted publicly for the first time that it had used the simulated drowning technique of waterboarding on terror suspects in its custody.

Past practitioners of waterboarding, which is condemned around the globe as torture, have included the Spanish Inquisitors and the Khmer Rouge. Official confirmation that American interrogators had joined their ranks was almost lost in a blizzard of rolling headlines as the contenders battled through Super Tuesday’s historic “national primary” for their party’s presidential nomination.

Michael Hayden, the CIA director, confirmed the use of waterboarding in congressional testimony, in response to leaked reports that the tactic was used on three al-Qaeda suspects in the two years after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The admission prompted demands from Democratic senators for an investigation into whether interrogators broke the law.

Continued . . .

US censured for waterboarding

February 7, 2008

Martin Hodgson and agencies
Thursday February 7, 2008
The Guardian

The UN’s chief torture investigator criticised the US government yesterday for defending the use of “waterboarding”, an interrogation method often described as a form of torture.

Manfred Nowak, the special rapporteur on torture, said: “This is absolutely unacceptable under international human rights law. [The] time has come that the government will actually acknowledge that they did something wrong and not continue trying to justify what is unjustifiable.”

On Tuesday, the CIA admitted for the first time that it had used the technique, in which interrogators strap a suspect to a board and pour water through a cloth over the face, creating a sensation of drowning. Testifying before Congress, the CIA director, Michael Hayden, said the method had been used on the suspected September 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and senior al-Qaida leaders Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri.

Continued . . .

US military admits to a dozen civilian deaths in Iraq

February 6, 2008
World Socialist Web Site, 6 February 2008

By Naomi Spencer

The US military confirmed Tuesday that soldiers shot dead at least three Iraqi civilians in their beds Monday night north of Baghdad. The admission comes just a day after military officials acknowledged that nine civilians were killed in an Army air raid south of the capital on February 2.

The incidents, which were only acknowledged by the military after inquiries from the media, highlight the ongoing brutality of the US occupation and its reliance on indiscriminate firepower.

On Saturday, witnesses in Iskandariya said the air raid came after a mortar attack on a US convoy at a checkpoint manned by US-backed Sunni fighters, members of the so-called Awakening Councils. Calling the air raid “the deadliest case of mistaken identity since November,” the Associated Press reported that the Army retaliated to the hostile fire by calling in strikes on a nearby home where Awakening Council fighters had sought cover. Helicopters bombarded the house, killing eight adults and a child, and wounding three others, including two children.

Continued . . .

Why Were the 9/11 Tapes Destroyed?

February 6, 2008

Did They Reveal the Absence of Confessions?

By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS | Counterpunch, February 4, 2008

Many Americans are content with the 9/11 Commission Report, but the two chairmen of the commission, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton are not. Neither was commission member Max Cleland, a US Senator who resigned from the 9/11 Commission, telling the Boston Globe (November 13, 2003): “This investigation is now compromised.” Even former FBI director Louis Freeh wrote in the Wall Street Journal (Nov. 17, 2005) that there are inaccuracies in the commission’s report and “questions that need answers.”

Both Kean and Hamilton have twice stated publicly, once in their 2006 book, Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission, and again in the January 2, 2008, New York Times, that there are inaccuracies in their report and unanswered–or mis-answered–questions.

On the second day of this new year, Kean and Hamilton accused the CIA of obstructing their investigation: “What we do know is that government officials decided not to inform a lawfully constituted body, created by Congress and the President, to investigate one of the greatest tragedies to confront this country. We call that obstruction.”

Keep reading . . .

Let’s end the siege, and talk

February 6, 2008

There is no way out of this nightmare until negotiations begin between all sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Lynne Segal | The Guardian: Comment is free, Feb 5, 2008

Independent Jewish Voices (IJV) celebrates its first year with its eyes on Gaza, demanding an end to the Israeli blockade and, on the uneven playing field of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, an end to human rights abuses on both sides.

IJV was formed a year ago to raise issues of human rights generally, but especially in that part of the world where we feel our voices might have most resonance, urging a fair and peaceful end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Happily, despite inevitable opposition, we quickly gained significant support and media coverage for our stance, especially in Jewish publications around the world.

Such exposure enabled us to further our goal in launching IJV, which was to change the parameters of the debate in this conflict: prioritising the issue of human rights, paying attention to the situation of both Palestinians and Israelis in the search for peace, opposing all forms of racism. Tragically, over this same year, we have seen no serious move coming from the vastly stronger party in the conflict, the Israeli state, towards ending the multiple human rights abuses in the Palestinian territories it controls.

Continued . . .