Cluster Bombs and Civilian Lives: Efficient Killing, Profits and Human Rights

July 15, 2010
Ramzy Baroud, Foreign Policy Journal, July 9, 2010

Cluster bombs are in the news again, thanks to a recent report from Amnesty International.

The human rights agency has confirmed that 35 women and children were killed following the latest US attacks on an alleged al-Qaeda hideout in Yemen. Initially, there were attempts to bury the story, and Yemen officially denied that civilians were killed as a result of the December 17 attack on al-Majala in southern Yemen. However, it has been simply impossible to conceal what is now considered the largest loss of life in one single US attack in the country.

Continues >>

Carl Levin Wants To Expand Drone Strikes In Pakistan

July 15, 2010

Sam Stein, The Huffington Post, July 13, 2010

Levin

The top Senate Democrat on defense issues said on Tuesday that he would like to see an expansion of the U.S. military’s controversial drone-strike operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Senator Carl Levin (D-Mich.), who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, told a group of reporters that he favors targeting the militant insurgent group, the Haqqani network, through drone strikes — something that U.S. forces don’t currently do.

“As a matter of fact, I think we have to include on the list other threats to the Afghan mission,” Levin said, during a breakfast sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor. “We have to have, I believe, we should have on our list the headquarters of the Haqqani network. We know where they are. We know where that headquarters is… I don’t think they should be off-limits to those strikes. They directly threaten the Afghan mission.”

“I think we have got to have them on a list of targets, absolutely,” he added, after the breakfast. “I don’t see any reason why they are not on a target list and I won’t be surprised if they are. So I’m not gonna go beyond that.”

Continues >>

The Charade of Relaxing the Gaza Blockade

July 15, 2010

Prabir Purkayastha, Newsclick, 09 July 2010

The Israeli regime has now agreed to lift partially the blockade of Gaza: potato chips, mattresses, washing machines, honey – all of which were banned earlier can now enter Gaza. Predictably, the US and EU Governments have welcomed this Israeli step, without questioning the military significance of the earlier banning potato chips. Nor have these leaders of the “civilized world”, continuously teaching the virtues of human rights and democracy to their more “backward brethren” in the global south, questioned what is the military significance of banning Gaza exports and preventing exit of students to study in the West Bank? How do Gaza’s exports affect Israel’s security? How do preventing Gaza students from studying in the West Bank increase its security?

Continues >>

Vital leads ‘ignored’ in Natalya Estemirova murder investigation

July 15, 2010
One year on, many observers suspect cover-up over Russian human rights campaigner’s murder in Chechnya
Tom Parfitt in Moscow
The Guardian/UK, July 14, 2010

Natalia Estemirova
Natalya Estemirova. Photograph: MEMORIAL/HO/EPA

Activists in Russia have accused investigators of ignoring vital leads in the official inquest into the assassination of the human rights campaigner Natalya Estemirova.

The murder of Estemirova – who was kidnapped outside her home in Chechnya, shot several times and dumped in a field in neighbouring Ingushetia a year ago tomorrow – provoked international outrage.

Her colleagues say that detectives have failed to interview key witnesses and refused to take DNA samples from suspects to compare with human material found on Estemirova’s body.

“The investigation started out promisingly, collecting vital clues, but then it froze,” said Elena Milashina, a reporter from the Novaya Gazeta newspaper, who knew Estemirova and has followed the investigation.

Estemirova, 51 at the time of her death, lived and worked in the Chechen capital, Grozny. Full-scale hostilities between separatists and federal troops ended in Chechnya in 2001, but an underground war between Islamist rebels and pro-Moscow forces has dragged on.

Estemirova wrote about people who acted with impunity on both sides, but specialised in recording the transgressions of militia under the control of the republic’s Kremlin-appointed president, Ramzan Kadyrov, who often try to flush out guerrillas by targeting their civilian relatives.

Kadyrov, who called Estemirova a “woman without honour or shame” shortly after her death, has vehemently denied involvement in the assassination.

Investigators now say they have solved Estemirova’s murder, finding she was killed by a boyevik (rebel fighter) called Alkhazur Bashayev from Shalazhi village in central Chechnya. Bashayev was allegedly upset by reports Estemirova wrote about his armed group for the Russian human rights organisation Memorial, whose office she headed in Grozny.

This theory rests on investigators’ claims earlier this year that they had found a rebel arms cache in Shalazhi including the pistol used in the killing, a car fitting descriptions of that used to kidnap Estemirova, part of a silencer in the boot of the car which fitted the pistol, and then the owner of the car, who said he had sold it to Bashayev.

Bashayev – too conveniently, say critics – cannot be questioned because he was killed in a shootout with security forces last autumn.

In fact, many observers suspect a cover-up. They think Estemirova, known to friends as Natasha, was killed for the reports she wrote on wayward law enforcement agencies – perhaps even those filed in the days before her death.

One report described how officers in the police department of Chechnya’s Kurchaloy district had publicly executed Rizvan Albekov, an unarmed man suspected of helping the rebels, on 7 July.

“Natasha must have struggled with her captors because investigators obtained DNA samples of three people from under her fingernails,” said Milashina. “Why have no samples been taken from the police officers in Kurchaloy for comparative study?”

Critics say there are other glaring errors: Estemirova never visited Shalazhi or wrote about Bashayev; and investigators have not questioned any of the witnesses who saw her being kidnapped near her home in Grozny.

Oleg Orlov, the head of Memorial, said investigators must seek Estemirova’s killers among those she exposed.

“Above all, the investigation needs to determine who were the guilty parties in the crimes that Natasha was examining,” he said. “So far, they have not looked at a single case she handled in the year she died.”

Fox’s Chief Legal Analyst: Bush and Cheney Should Have Been Indicted for “Torturing, for Spying, for Arresting Without Warrant”

July 14, 2010

Fox News’ senior judicial analyst made some surprising remarks Saturday that may go against the grain at his conservative network.

AlterNet, July 12, 2010 |

Fox News’ senior judicial analyst made some surprising remarks Saturday that may go against the grain at his conservative network.

In a interview with Ralph Nader on C-SPAN’s Book TV to promote his book Lies the Government Told You, Judge Andrew Napolitano said that President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney should have been indicted for “torturing, for spying, for arresting without warrant.”

The judge believes that it is a fallacy to say that the US treats suspects as innocent until proven guilty. “The government acts as if a defendant is guilty merely on the basis of an accusation,” said Napolitano.

Continues >>

Tony Blair : A Bright Shining Lie (with thanks to Neil Sheehan.)

July 14, 2010

Felicity Arbuthnot, uruknet.info, July 14, 2010

14blair_bloody_war_criminal.jpg

“Now all my lies are proved untrue
And I must face the men I slew.
What tale shall serve me here among
Mine angry and defrauded young?”

(Epitaphs of War, Rudyard Kipling, 1865-1936.)

We live in strange times. In October 2009, the fledgling President Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for: ” .. his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples.” He was: “surprised and deeply humbled”, accepting it as : “a call to action.” Oh good, more “… diplomacy and co-operation …?” Not quite.

Two months later Barack Hussein Obama announced that killing more Afghans and throwing $’s millions in to doing it was his first priority. (He didn’t quite put it like that. He told an audience at West Point * that the deployment of 30,000 additional troops was a goal vital to: “the common security of the world.” It would: ” … break the Taliban’s momentum and increase Afghanistan’s capacity …” Goals would not be set: “… beyond our responsibility, our means, or our interests.”)

Continues >>

For first time in nine months, Israel razes Palestinian homes in East Jerusalem

July 14, 2010

Municipality says structures were not homes but witnesses report Palestinian family removing belongings.

By Nir Hasson, Natasha Mozgovaya and News Agencies, Haaretz/Israel, July 13, 2010

Israel razed on Tuesday an inhabited Palestinian home in East Jerusalem for the first time in eight months, effectively ending an unofficial freeze of such internationally condemned demolitions.

A Reuters photographer witnessed a Palestinian family removing its belongings from the house in East Jerusalem’s Beit Hanina neighborhood before an Israeli excavator tore into the dwelling.

“They can build hundreds of settlements but I’m not entitled to live in a shack?” asked Linda al-Rajabi outside the demolished dwelling she shared with her husband and their five children.

Continues >>

The Unchallenged Power of the Israel Lobby in America

July 14, 2010

On Being Led By the Nose

By James  Abourezk, Counterpunch, July 12, 2010

I picked up a copy of a memoir written by the long-gone CIA Director, George Tenet.   On the first page of the book’s preface, Mr. Tenet described what it was like on the day after the World Trade Towers had exploded as a result of the terrorists’ actions on 9-11-01.

I quote Mr. Tenet here:

“All this weighed heavy on my mind as I walked beneath the awning that leads to the West Wing and saw Richard Perle exiting the building just as I was about to enter.  Perle is one of the godfathers of the neoconservative movement and, at the time, was head of the Defense Policy Board, an independent advisory group attached to the Secretary of Defense.  Ours was little more than a passing acquaintance.  As the doors closed behind him, we made eye contact and nodded.  I had just reached the door myself when Perle turned to me and said, ‘Iraq has to pay a price for what happened yesterday.  ‘They bear responsibility.’ (Italics added).

“I was stunned but said nothing.  Eighteen hours earlier, I had scanned passenger manifests for the four hijacked airplanes  that showed beyond a doubt that al-Qa’ida was behind the attacks.  Over the months and years to follow, we would carefully examine the potential of a collaborative role for state sponsors.  The intelligence then and now, however, showed no evidence of Iraqi complicity.”

The idea that George W. Bush’s neocon advisers–Perle included–convinced him that the U.S. should invade Iraq received some attention after the Iraqi war started.  But to my knowledge, no one, either in politics or the media, pressed the case too hard, lest they discover that those who wanted to invade Iraq had, not America’s interest, but Israel’s interest in mind.

Continues >>

Saudi Arabia: Charges Against Rights Activist Frivolous

July 14, 2010

Prosecution Charges Mikhlif al-Shammari With “Annoying Others”

Human Rights Watch, July 14, 2010

If ‘annoyance’ is an imprisonable offense in Saudi Arabia, then scores of government officials should be behind bars, not least because of this frivolous prosecution of a man who is making a serious contribution to defending the rights of fellow Saudis. If anyone has reason to be truly annoyed, it’s al-Shammari for being locked up on a frivolous charge.

Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch

(New York) – Prosecutors should immediately drop charges against Shaikh Mikhlif bin Dahham al-Shammari, a human rights activist, and release him, Human Rights Watch said today.

Continues >>

Obama: Tell Americans the Truth About Afghanistan

July 14, 2010

Eric Margolis, The Huffington Post, July 12, 2010

Goodbye, fire-breathing Gen. Stanley McChrystal, and your Special Forces “mafia,” who were supposed to crush Afghan resistance to western occupation.

McChrystal was fired after rude remarks he and his staff made about the White House were printed in the American magazine, Rolling Stone. President Barack Obama should have fired McChrystal when the loose-lipped general went public with demands that 40,000 more troops be sent to Afghanistan.

McChrystal was the second U.S. commander in a row in Afghanistan to be fired, an ominous sign that the war was going very badly. He will now likely enter the Republican ranks as a martyr and become a Fox TV critic of Barack Obama.

Continues >>