Archive for August, 2007

Iraqi Deaths Due to U.S. Invasion 1,009,516

August 18, 2007

Just Foreign Policy

Learn More Get Involved Blog Audio Newsroom About Us Donate Home

Deutsch

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator

Add this to your website

The number is shocking and sobering.

It is at least 10 times greater than most estimates cited in the US media, yet it is based on the only scientifically valid study of violent Iraqi deaths caused by the U.S.-led invasion of March 2003.

That study, published in prestigious medical journal The Lancet, estimated that over 600,000 Iraqis had been killed as a result of the invasion as of July 2006. Iraqis have continued to be killed since then. The graphic above provides a rough daily update of this number based on a rate of increase derived from the Iraq Body Count. (See the complete explanation.)

This devastating human toll demands greater recognition. It eclipses the Rwandan genocide and our leaders are directly responsible. Little wonder they do not publicly cite it. Here is simple HTML code to post the counter to your website and help spread the word.

Al-Faraheen’s victims of Israeli pretexts

August 17, 2007

Electronic Intifada

Rami Almeghari writing from Al-Faraheen, occupied Gaza Strip, Live from Palestine, Aug 17, 2007

Palestinians inspect the wreckage of what used to be their home after it was destroyed during an Israeli military incursion in the southern Gaza Strip, 14 August 2007. (Wissam Nassar/MaanImages)

Surveillance cameras and watchtowers loom over more than 800 meters away from the scene of destruction left by Israeli army tanks and bulldozers following the latest Israeli invasion of the al-Faraheen area in Abbassan al-Kabeera town, to the east of Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip.

“Fifteen dunums [four acres] of tomatoes along with 400 meters of irrigation pipes were crushed by the Israeli tanks during the invasion into our area, where myself and two other partners make our living,” says Samir al-Naqa, a local farmer in the al-Faraheen area.

Samir affirms that the invasion took place in the middle of the day. “I’d bet whether there was a single resistance fighter in the area; I’d bet the Israeli army whether there is a single tunnel in the area. It’s our land, through which we feed our children. Where to go, we have no other choice, despite the fact they invaded the area about four times this year.”

Israeli media quoted sources who claimed that the invasion was a bid to prevent Palestinian attempts to smuggle weapons through underground tunnels.

When one walks down the arable lands in al-Faraheen, following Tuesday’s invasion, one is struck by the sight of heaps of torn apart olive trees, dead tomato vines and holes in nearby walls thanks to the Israeli tanks that wreaked the destruction ostensibly in pursuit of resistance fighters or in search of underground tunnels.

Almost 800 meters away lies a long barbed-wire fence that separates al-Faraheen from Israel. This fence is equipped with surveillance cameras and watchtowers, in a way that not only prevents infiltrators but also discovers any moving object.

“I hope there was a single tunnel that Israel can destroy; we have been living here for ages. All their allegations are false ones,” says Anwar Abu Daqqa, a 43-year-old landlord.

Anwar gave a tour of the areas where the Israeli army tanks rolled through, including a newly-built graveyard that was damaged by the tanks.

“Look, sir, I am in charge of this small cemetery; how come the tank rolls over graveyards — are they tunnels? Are there resistance fighters hidden inside? I really wonder and I bet whether a single resistance fighter can come to our closed area. Many times I myself prevented resistance fighters from approaching the area, for concern over our children’s lives,” Anwar maintains.

Anwar himself lost 30 cows during an Israeli invasion into al-Faraheen last year when the Israeli army remained in the area for 24 hours, so he decided to sell the rest of his livestock.

Heading deep inside the populated area, there is another scene of destruction created by Israeli tanks and shells — a completely destroyed three-story house, where the Israeli army killed two resistance fighters of Hamas along with the 70-year-old mother of one of them.

Mohammad Qdaih, an eyewitness, recalls the events. “When the army shot dead Omar al-Qarra, Omar’s mother rushed to her son out of her great concern. However, the Israeli soldiers shot her dead over Omar’s body.”

Safa’ Braim, a local woman, described the Israeli invasion. “They were [the Israelis] shooting at the houses heavily and randomly. We could not even look from the windows. This is not the first time that they invade our area; what we need now is that they stop their aggression against us and leave us and our children to live safely at least.”

Tuesday’s Israeli invasion into the al-Faraheen area in southern Gaza claimed the lives of seven Palestinians, including an elderly woman and two resistance fighters, and caused the injury of more than 35 others, including five who are critically wounded.

According to local sources, the area has been invaded five or six times over the past year and a half and each time, tanks have left behind horror, destruction and death.

Rami Almeghari is currently contributor to several media outlets including the Palestine Chronicle, aljazeerah.info, IMEMC, The Electronic Intifada and Free Speech Radio News. Rami is also a former senior English translator at and editor in chief of the international press center of the Gaza-based Palestinian Information Service. He can be contacted at rami_almeghari at hotmail.com.

Related Links

  • Israeli forces kill four, arrest dozens in ongoing Gaza operation, PCHR (14 August 2007)
  •  

    U.S. urges Musharraf and Bhutto to consider cooperating

    August 17, 2007

    Swissinfo, August 16, 2007

    Benazir Bhutto

    By Arshad Mohammed

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The United States has urged embattled Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf to explore ways of cooperating politically with former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, a diplomat said on Thursday.

     

    The effort to encourage a political deal, first reported by The New York Times, appears aimed at shoring up Musharraf’s eroding domestic support and at ensuring Pakistan’s continued cooperation with the United States in the war on terrorism.

    The strategy carries risks for Washington, which could be seen as meddling in Pakistan’s internal affairs, and for Bhutto, who could taint herself by allying with Musharraf, who seized power in a bloodless coup eight years ago.

     

    The Pakistani president, who is preparing to seek a second term in office, has seen his popularity plunge since his failed attempt to oust Pakistan’s chief justice this year and he faces a deepening political crisis at home.

     

    Since early July, more than 300 people in Pakistan have been killed in bomb attacks, in clashes with militants and in an army assault on Islamabad’s Red Mosque to crush a Taliban-style movement.

     

    Musharraf has been regarded by the United States as a vital ally since his decision after the September 11 attacks on the United States to cooperate with Washington in combating al Qaeda and the Taliban in neighbouring Afghanistan.

     

    The diplomat, who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the matter, said U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Zalmay Khalilzad met Bhutto recently and that the United States was encouraging Musharraf and Bhutto to “look at ways to cooperate politically.”

     

    In its report, The New York Times stated the matter more baldly, saying the Bush administration was struggling to find a way to keep Musharraf in power and was quietly prodding him to “share authority” with Bhutto.

     

    MODERATE CENTER

     

    In an interview, Bhutto said that she had met Khalilzad in a private capacity and denied the United States was explicitly pushing her to forge a power-sharing deal with Musharraf.

     

    “They have certainly not come up and said this is what we want you to do,” she told Reuters.

     

    “From my perspective, the issue is not working out a power-sharing arrangement and distributing power,” she added. “From my perspective, this is about saving Pakistan from chaos, it’s about saving Pakistan from dictatorship, and it’s about saving the Pakistani people from the misery that comes when there is conflict and that leads to poverty and unemployment.”

     

    “That’s why we are engaged in these negotiations (with Musharraf). To see whether we can come to an understanding that facilitates democracy in — and the stability of — Pakistan,” she said.

     

    U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher, having met the Pakistani leadership during a two-day visit to Islamabad, declined to respond when asked if the United States was mediating between Musharraf and Bhutto.

     

    He said the Pakistani people should choose their next government in elections and he had been encouraging political leaders to help ensure the vote is fair.

     

    “I’ve also encouraged them to look at what can be done to strengthen the moderate centre of Pakistani politics,” Boucher told reporters in Islamabad. “The more that those tendencies can be brought forward and joined, the more solid base there is to deal with the serious problem of extremism.”

     

    RISKS FOR BHUTTO

     

    Analysts said a power-sharing deal might broaden Musharraf’s political base and improve his popularity but carried risks for Bhutto.

     

    “The biggest risk is that by doing a deal in which she throws her support to a military dictator she will lose her credibility as an independent opposition politician,” said Teresita Schaffer, a Pakistan expert at the CSIS think tank.

     

    The United States has become increasingly frustrated that Musharraf has not done enough to combat Taliban militants on his side of the largely lawless border with Afghanistan as well as worried about his political standing.

     

    In a sign of U.S. concern, Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte is likely to visit Pakistan in September in his second trip to the country this year, the U.S. official said.

     

    State Department spokesman Sean McCormack declined to comment on whether Khalilzad had met Bhutto but he stressed that the Bush administration had talked to “all parties.”

     

    (Additional reporting by Robert Birsel in Islamabad and JoAnne Allen in Washington)
    Reuters (IDS)

    Second Lebanon War:Most of the war crimes were Israel’s

    August 17, 2007

    Information Clearing House

    A year after the Second Lebanon War

    By Jonathan Cook

    08/16/07 “ICH” — — This week marks a year since the end of hostilities now officially called the Second Lebanon war by Israelis. A month of fighting — mostly Israeli aerial bombardment of Lebanon, and rocket attacks from the Shia militia Hizbullah on northern Israel in response — ended with more than 1,000 Lebanese civilians and a small but unknown number of Hizbullah fighters dead, as well as 119 Israeli soldiers and 43 civilians.

    When Israel and the United States realised that Hizbullah could not be bombed into submission, they pushed a resolution, 1701, through the United Nations. It placed an expanded international peacekeeping force, UNIFIL, in south Lebanon to keep Hizbullah in check and try to disarm its few thousand fighters.

    But many significant developments since the war have gone unnoticed, including several that seriously put in question Israel’s account of what happened last summer. This is old ground worth revisiting for that reason alone.

    Continue . . .

    Backlash Over Book on Policy for Israel

    August 16, 2007

    Source: New York Times

    Authors of a new book: Stephen Walt, left, of Harvard University, and John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago.

    By PATRICIA COHEN
    Published: August 16, 2007

    “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy” is not even in bookstores, but already anxieties have surfaced about the backlash it is stirring, with several institutions backing away from holding events with the authors.

    John J. Mearsheimer, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, and Stephen M. Walt, a professor at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, were not totally surprised by the reaction to their work. An article last spring in the London Review of Books outlining their argument — that a powerful pro-Israel lobby has a pernicious influence on American policy — set off a firestorm as charges of anti-Semitism, shoddy scholarship and censorship ricocheted among prominent academics, writers, policymakers and advocates. In the book, published by Farrar, Straus & Giroux and embargoed until Sept. 4, they elaborate on and update their case.

    Read the full story

    Neolibs and Neocons United and Interchangeable

    August 16, 2007

    August 14, 2007
    Antiwar/Philip Giraldi
    When it comes to foreign policy, particularly as it relates to the Middle East, there is not a whole lot of separation between the Democratic and Republican Parties. Republicans tend to be more bellicose in their statements, but Democrats have more than made up for that with their steely resolve to take the fight to the enemy wherever he might be. Both Republicans and Democrats reflexively support Israel, and nearly all candidates are in agreement on a number of other areas, including an aggressive policy toward Iran.This unanimity is not particularly surprising as there is little or no serious debate on foreign policy and many of the leading candidates’ advisers are graduates of the same school of thought, i.e., that the United States must use its military power to impose certain standards on the rest of the world. Neoconservatives and neoliberals are really quite similar, so it doesn’t matter who gets elected in 2008. The American public, weary of preemptive attacks, democracy-promotion, and nation-building, will still get war either way.

    Continue . . .

    Tool Time: Rove Goes But the Malevolent Machine Rolls On

    August 16, 2007

    Lew Rockwell, August 16, 2007

    By Chris Floyd

    hI.

    Karl Rove has resigned, and for the moment that seems like good news – although given the history and M.O. of the Bush gang, it will probably lead to something worse in one way or another. For example, look how much better things are now that Don Rumsfeld has gone! We’ve progressed from his last-days, panicky memos about curtailing the war (while spinning it as a victory) to a full-bore, wide-open escalation of the conflict which the chief surger, Gen. David Petraeus, tells us could last for 10 more years. Or for another, even more glaring example, look how things improved at the Justice Department after John Ashcroft was replaced by Alberto Gonzales. Colin Powell was a weak and pathetic bagman, whoring his media-inflated prestige to sell a war he didn’t believe in – but aren’t things so much better with Condi Rice in charge at State?

    No, if there’s one rule of thumb that consistently applies to the Bush Gang, it’s this: every move they make – whether by choice or forced by events – makes matters worse. So while we all wait for the other shoe to drop on Rove’s resignation – i.e., the real reason behind his sudden bug-out – the Bush Gang will doubtless be putting the boot in somewhere else.

    II.

    But of course, for all the media oxygen it has consumed – and will continue to consume – Rove’s departure is small potatoes. Despite his vaunted “genius” for political skulduggery, in the end Rove too is a drab factotum, a bagman, a greasy cog in a vast machine that will keep grinding on, killing and corrupting, without him. (Assuming that Rove is actually stepping away from the machine, which is most unlikely.) Stories of far greater significance than the slinking exit of a dirt-smeared toady have appeared in the last two days – items far more revelatory of the hellish world that the porcine minion has helped make on behalf of his masters.

    The boiling core of this hell is Iraq. Stories breaking while Rove and Bush were puddling up on the White House lawn revealed a new abyss of criminality in the war crime that the tearful tyrant and his henchman have engendered: the Mafia running guns to Bush’s favored extremist factions in Iraq. As the Guardian reports, Italian anti-Mafia police, tracking down a drug deal, instead came across shipment of 105,000 AK-47s procured by the underworld for their paying client: the Iraqi Interior Ministry. The Ministry said the guns were intended for its security forces – i.e., extremist sectarian militias in government drag. The Pentagon denied knowledge of the Mafia guns, but the middleman for the deal was a Dubai company with “scores of supply and service contracts for the U.S. occupation,” the Guardian reported. The company, “citing the names of ‘friends’ in top U.S. military ranks in Iraq,” said it had written approval from the Pentagon authorizing it “to do all kinds of business.”

    On the same day, Newsweek‘s Christopher Dickey wrote of how thousands of American weapons ostensibly intended for Iraqi security forces have been flooding the Middle East, often ending up in the hands of extremist groups – or violent loners. As Dickey notes, this influx of deadly weapons on the streets is tied to last week’s revelations about the vast arsenal of weapons that have disappeared from American training programs for Iraqi forces:

    At least three U.S. government agencies are now investigating the massive “disappearance” and diversion of weapons Washington intended for Iraqi government forces that instead have spread to militants and organized gangs across the region. The potential size of the traffic is stunning. A report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office last month showed that since 2004, some 190,000 AK-47 assault rifles and pistols, bought with U.S. money for Iraqi security forces, have gone missing.

    And looming behind all of these deals and disappearances involving small arms is a far more deadly and far-reaching dereliction of duty: the scarcely-reported failure of the U.S. military to secure the vast dumps of weapons and explosives left behind by Saddam’s army in 2003. As David Gardner reminds us in the Financial Times:

    This discovery [the missing 190,000 weapons] might be considered the mother of all known unknowns, were it not that in March this year the GAO published a drily damning report on the coalition’s failure to secure scores upon scores of arms dumps abandoned by the Iraqi army after the 2003 invasion – and that by October last year it had still failed to secure this giant toolbox that keeps the daily slaughter going in Iraq.

    All of this sounds like rank incompetence: “Whoa, we didn’t even notice that Interior Ministry deal with the Mob! Goodness me, we just plumb forgot to track those 190,000 AK-47s! Golly gee, we were just too busy to get around to those arms dumps. Been meaning to do it forever, but something always came up.”

    But it isn’t incompetence. Certainly, the decision not to find and secure the weapons dumps was a matter of deliberate policy. The decision not to track the vast store of American arms being given to Iraqi security forces was also deliberate policy – perhaps devised by the general in charge of arming and training Iraqi security forces at the time: one David Petraeus. And the arms trafficking with the underworld by factions in the Bush-installed Iraqi government is almost certainly deliberate policy as well, either with the direct connivance of Washington, or else with the usual wink and a nod and a looking-away.

    The Mafia arms deal is one of those glimpses we get from time to time into how the world really works, in the finely meshed intertwining between the underworld and the “upperworld” – “respectable” Establishment society, “legitimate” governments led by “honorable” officials. The BCCI affair in the 1980s was another such glimpse. BCCI was an international bank that fronted for what the U.S. Senate later called “one of the largest criminal enterprises in history.” Backed by Establishment grandees and national governments around the world, BCCI “laundered money on a global scale, intimidated witnesses and law officers, engaged in extortion and blackmail. It supplied the financing for illegal arms trafficking and global terrorism. It financed and facilitated income tax evasion, smuggling and prostitution,” as journalist Christopher Bryon, who first exposed the operation, put it.

    The George Bushes, father and son, were hip deep in BCCI sleaze. Bush I used the bank to secretly fund Saddam Hussein’s war machine – then intervened to quash federal investigations of the scam. George II was bailed out of one of his many business failures with a $25 million honeypot from a BCCI bank, brokered by the mysterious money-man Jackson Stephens, who in the 1992 presidential election had the signal distinction of being a top contributor to both Bush I and Bill Clinton. Bill has since been “adopted” by the elder George as an honorary son. And why not? When he took office, Clinton killed off the ongoing probes into his predecessor’s entanglements with BCCI, and even killed a lot of Iraqis over an almost certainly bogus attempt on his future “dad’s” life. (For more on the cozy Bush-Clinton connection, see A Tale of Two Houses. For more on the Bushes and BCCI, see Scar Tissue.)

    The chaotic nexus where organized crime, terrorism, drug-running, covert ops and government policy churn and thrash together is where the business of the world gets done. It fuels the machine serviced by tools like Rove, the machine that has brought so much death and anguish to Iraq – and is slowly devouring the entrails of America as well.

    August 16, 2007

    Chris Floyd [send him mail] is the author of Empire Burlesque: The Secret History of the Bush Regime.

    U.S. Army Suicides at Highest Rate in 26 Years

    August 16, 2007

    Editor and Publisher

    Published: August 15, 2007

    WASHINGTON Army soldiers committed suicide last year at the highest rate in 26 years, and more than a quarter did so while serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to a new military report.

    The report, obtained by The Associated Press ahead of its scheduled release Thursday, found there were 99 confirmed suicides among active duty soldiers during 2006, up from 88 the previous year and the highest since the 102 suicides in 1991.

    ”Iraq was the most common deployment location for both (suicides) and attempts,” the report said.

    The 99 suicides included 28 soldiers deployed to the two wars and 71 who weren’t. About twice as many women serving in Iraq and Afghanistan committed suicide as did women not sent to war, the report said.

    Read the full story

    Bush’s surge is ‘working’: Ten American soldiers killed in Iraq

    August 15, 2007

    Source: The Turkish Press.com

    Published: 8/14/2007

    BAGHDAD – Ten more American soldiers were reported killed across Iraq, including five when their helicopter crashed in the western Sunni province of Al-Anbar, the military said Tuesday.

    The CH-47 Chinook helicopter crashed near the Al-Taqaddum air base “while conducting a routine post-maintenance check flight,” the military added, saying the incident was under investigation.

    Earlier, the military reported the deaths of another five soldiers in insurgent attacks.

    Three Task Force Lightning soldiers died and one more was wounded when insurgents set off a bomb near their vehicle on Monday in the restive northern province of Nineveh, the military said.

    The military did not give the specific location of the attack but said the blast occurred when the soldiers were conducting security operations.

    A soldier was killed and three more wounded during combat operations in western Baghdad on Tuesday, the military said in a separate statement.

    Another soldier was also killed similarly in the same area of Baghdad on Monday, the military added.

    The latest fatalities brought the military’s losses in Iraq since the March 2003 invasion to 3,694, according to an AFP count based on Pentagon figures.

    At least 44 American soldiers have died in August.

    08/14/2007 19:34 GMT

    Stop the US war drive against Iran!

    August 15, 2007

    Source: WSWS

    4 February 2007

    Use this version to print | Send this link by email | Email the author

    This statement is available for download as a PDF 4-page brochure in both US Letter format and A4 format

    The World Socialist Web Site condemns the military and political provocations with which the Bush administration is laying the foundations for an attack on Iran. We call on all working people and student youth to oppose the brutal and insane warmongering of the Washington pyromaniacs. A politically conscious class-based movement—unconnected to and independent of the pro-imperialist parties of big business and the political establishment—must be built if war is to be averted.

    This is no time for complacency and illusions. Barely three months after the American people went to the polls and delivered an overwhelming popular repudiation of the war in the Middle East, the Bush administration is not only escalating its military operations in Iraq, but recklessly plunging towards a new war against neighboring Iran.

    Continue . . .